Colleges and universities should require all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in professions relevant to the courses they teach.
The speaker would prefer that colleges and universities should encourage all faculty to spend time working outside the academic world in profession relevant to their subject they teach. I strongly agree in so far with speaker claim is that spending quality time outside the field study definitely boost idle information regarding their courses which can ultimately institutionalized students in order to achieve surfeit information in their particular courses which they pursue.
To begin with, different faculty members who take out their time on visiting social sites and environment can achieve various new ideas and information in their field of study. For instance, if the professor of Sociology works in the field along with their bountiful students then it is quite that such students can easily students different social customs, traditions and rituals prevailing with the society. This sort of participation in the field study provide them immense knowledge regarding the formation of society and their ideological formation. Therefore, such students will be well-educated and can transfer their knowledge towards the upcoming generation.
Secondly, practical based knowledge will prolong and endured for generations. For instance, students who are guided by well-qualified and skilled professors and lecturers can proceed efficiently during their work field. Similarly, they will become competitive and well-fitted to the different challenges that comes in front of them. Likewise, such practical based teaching environment guide students effectively so as to be qualified and sustainable in the global arena. For example, students who considered bookish knowledge as their main source of knowledge will be always fall backward when time comes to show their skill in the working field. Therefore, theoretical based knowledge doesn't work at this date as this era is the era of science and technology where the people with acute knowledge and practical based ideas get survived.
Some may argue that working outside the academic zone make the students far away from their theoretical based information and hence, thereby they will be become dump and obtuse. As a result, such students won't be able to achieve excessive progress in their field of study. Moreover, the importance of universities and colleges study will also become decline. Hence, these will create deleterious impact in their educational atmosphere. However, this point is flawed since working outside the academic world not only bolster their courses but also give them direction regarding novel practices existing inside the society. Hence, this sort of practices make the students up to date with the current trends taking place inside the society and help them to achieve optimum success in their field of society.
All in all if the above factors are contemplated we can easily reach a conclusion that working outside the academic field in professions by the faculty members provide numerous benefits to the students in their field of study. Moreover, such sort of practices provide affirmative teaching trends within the nation which helps to build competitive manpower inside the whole nation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-10-31 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 70 | view |
| 2024-07-19 | Marqueetim | 83 | view |
| 2023-03-02 | tedyang777 | 50 | view |
| 2022-09-26 | Danbrilliant | 58 | view |
| 2022-09-25 | Danbrilliant | 62 | view |
- Governments officials should rely on their own judgment rather than unquestioningly carry out the will of the people they serve 66
- "Many other companies have recently stated that having their employees take the Easy ReadSpeed-Reading Course has greatly improved productivity. One graduate of the course wasable to read a five-hundred-page report in only two hours; another graduate 42
- The best way for a society to prepare its young people for leadership in government industry or other fields is by instilling in them a sense of cooperation not competition 66
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field. 83
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. 62
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 303, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... well-fitted to the different challenges that comes in front of them. Likewise, s...
^^
Line 3, column 413, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
... environment guide students effectively so as to be qualified and sustainable in the glo...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 687, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: doesn't
... Therefore, theoretical based knowledge doesnt work at this date as this era is the er...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: MASS_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error - use third-person verb forms for singular and mass nouns: 'argues'.
Suggestion: argues
...al based ideas get survived. Some may argue that working outside the academic zone ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, likewise, may, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, similarly, so, then, therefore, well, as to, for example, for instance, sort of, as a result, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 19.5258426966 56% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 14.8657303371 121% => OK
Relative clauses : 14.0 11.3162921348 124% => OK
Pronoun: 40.0 33.0505617978 121% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 68.0 58.6224719101 116% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 12.9106741573 116% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2692.0 2235.4752809 120% => OK
No of words: 487.0 442.535393258 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.52772073922 5.05705443957 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.69766713281 4.55969084622 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76591451991 2.79657885939 99% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 215.323595506 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.476386036961 0.4932671777 97% => OK
syllable_count: 837.0 704.065955056 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 6.24550561798 96% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.99550561798 40% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.38483146067 23% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.7205628626 60.3974514979 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.6 118.986275619 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.35 23.4991977007 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.6 5.21951772744 184% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 10.2758426966 136% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 5.13820224719 19% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.83258426966 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223250697328 0.243740707755 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0803482916848 0.0831039109588 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.144790702539 0.0758088955206 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16459434196 0.150359130593 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.147689667372 0.0667264976115 221% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 14.1392134831 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 48.8420337079 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 12.1743820225 113% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.1639044944 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.69 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 100.480337079 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.8971910112 168% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.