Human activity has had negative impacts on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that the ecosystem all over the globe is dangerously affected by the exploitation of mankind. Some intellectuals opine that this practice will never change, whereas others consider that the preventive actions by human being could bring the positive results. This essay agrees with the latter view.
To begin with, it is true that some impacts on global flora and fauna caused by humankind are irreversible as not many people are willing to change their destructive behaviours towards nature. This is because enterprises prioritize commercial values derived from exploitation of natural resources over the conservation of endangered species, which has no monetary benefits. For example, since 2010, over 20% of the natural forest area in Vietnam has been destroyed to make way for irrigated farm land, which threatened many wildlife species to disappear. This trend is predicted to continue into the future because of the elevating demands for agricultural production.
Nevertheless, there are many measures that governments and individuals can take to alleviate the negative effect that our activities have on our planet. Firstly, governments around the world must come together to address the issue of deforestation, which is the main cause of the disappearance of endangered species. For instance, the Vietnam government outlawed deforestation in 2018 and since then, the outcomes have been impressive as many animals have claimed their habitats and been saved from extinction. Moreover, individuals can also spread awareness about the destructive effect that some of our activities have on the planet. Obviously there are still many more things that we can do to address the issue.
In conclusion, even though it is true that some impacts caused by the human community on the nature are irreversible, preventive steps could improve the present scenario. In my opinion, the firm determination of governments and individuals could contribute to restoring the natural habitat and fruitful outcomes could be expected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | sharma as | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | trannhi4566 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | tranminh | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | thaovuphuong19 | 84 | view |
- 2 Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- The table below gives information about the use of different modes of transport in Shanghai in 1996, and one possible projection (high motorization scenario) for their use in 2020.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information below. 78
- Human activity has had negative impacts on plants and animals around the world Some people think that this cannot be changed while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- The line graph below shows the percentage of tourists to England who visited four different attractions in Brighton 78
- Most of the world’s poor live in countries where tourism is a growing industry. The issue is that tourism does not benefit the poorest.How can the income generated by tourism benefit the poor? And how can we ensure that tourism does not destroy traditio 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, then, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1731.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.5303514377 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97821162966 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581469648562 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.6575261763 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.642857143 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3571428571 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.6428571429 7.06120827912 165% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182037578852 0.244688304435 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0566571430361 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0481593474166 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102365826631 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0376797390837 0.056905535591 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.09 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 78.4519038076 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.