Human activity has had a negative impact on plants and animals around the world. Some people think that this cannot be changed, while others believe actions can be taken to bring about a change. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is irrefutable that the ecosystem all over the globe is dangerously affected by the exploitation of mankind. Some intellectuals opine that this practice will never change, whereas others consider that the preventive actions by human beings could bring positive results. This essay will analyze both the views, along with my opinion.
To begin with, regarding the former view, the unsustainable exploitation of natural resources is done by humans to fulfill their desires. Consequently, people are not bothering about the detrimental impact on the indigenous flora and fauna due to such activities. Moreover, the greedy nature of a human only focuses on their needs and prosperity instead of the surrounding creatures. For instance, the concrete jungle of human society has wiped out many aboriginal plants and animals from their habitats. Thus, it is very hard to believe that the actions of mankind might change and restore the natural ecosystem.
On the other hand, some people having an optimistic view consider that people are also moving towards development by preserving natural habitats. Furthermore, such environmentally conscious people reckon their responsibility towards nature and coexistent creatures. For example, many conservation centers have been established in efforts to preserve their indigenous plants and animals, which might come endangered in the future. As a result, the population of these plants and animals could be maintained for a balanced ecosystem.
In conclusion, even though it is true that some impacts caused by the human community on the nature are irreversible, preventive steps could improve the present scenario. In my opinion, the firm determination of all the citizens could contribute to restoring the natural habitat and fruitful outcomes can be expected.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-07 | sharma as | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-22 | ulligadda sreeja | 73 | view |
| 2020-09-04 | trannhi4566 | 73 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | tranminh | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-24 | thaovuphuong19 | 84 | view |
- Most of the world’s poor live in countries where tourism is a growing industry. The issue is that tourism does not benefit the poorest.How can the income generated by tourism benefit the poor? And how can we ensure that tourism does not destroy traditio 67
- When children start school teachers have more influence on their intellectual and social development than their parents To what extent do you agree or disagree 89
- 5 There are more workers to work from home and more students to study from home This is because the computer technology is more and more easily accessible and cheaper Do you think it is a positive or negative development 84
- 2 Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- People can eat a variety of food that can be grown in other areas As a result people eat more food produced in other regions than local food Do you think the advantages of this trend outweigh the disadvantages 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, moreover, regarding, so, thus, whereas, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, in my opinion, it is true, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 24.0651302605 79% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1539.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 275.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.59636363636 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07223819929 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99100580114 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 176.041082164 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.607272727273 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 488.7 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6630601698 49.4020404114 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 109.928571429 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6428571429 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 13.7142857143 7.06120827912 194% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.238305456598 0.244688304435 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.074048974894 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.047273645758 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134507782658 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0232889488118 0.056905535591 41% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.2 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.8 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.