The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem

Essay topics:

The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?

Nowadays, we witnessed the world’s ecosystem destroyed dramatically indirectly by humans because of their high demands on consuming goods. This essay will provide the main reason for the loss of biodiversity and the possible solutions to this issue.
First of all, it is a fact that the more products we produce, the worse the environment it is. The main reason is that the needs of people have been going up gradually and the business had to produce more goods to meet the needs. To be specific, the more goods we consume, the more garbage we throw away and it harms the environment. For example, you take a drink away at Starbucks and you will get rid of the plastic cup when you finish it off. Therefore, if people do the same thing as you, there will be an enormous number of plastic trash which has a negative effect on the environment.
In terms of the solution, there are several methods to solve this issue but the possible simple one is launching some eco-friendly programs by the businesses to encourage the customers to be aware of protecting the environment. For example, customers now can bring their own bottle to buy a drink at Starbucks to cut down on using plastic cups. By this way, bringing their own bottle to drink will become a good habit which is constituted day by day through this program.
To sum up, if people together do such little things like bringing their bottle to buy drinks in order to protect the natural environment, the world will be greener in the future.

Votes
Average: 5.6 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-11-08 nguyenanh9182 89 view
2023-08-28 hieu13092006 89 view
2023-08-27 Charles Le 84 view
2023-08-11 quynhanhbuiviet 78 view
2023-06-19 hieu13092006 61 view

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Nowadays, we witnessed the world’s ecosy...
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, for example, first of all, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1615.20841683 77% => OK
No of words: 265.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.67924528302 5.12529762239 91% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60132233537 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 176.041082164 85% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.566037735849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 506.74238477 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.60771543086 87% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6403110889 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.727272727 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.09090909091 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.154493725394 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584212462871 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417134280069 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0897456732032 0.151304729494 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0363522645499 0.056905535591 64% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 50.2224549098 128% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.16 12.4159519038 82% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.58950901804 88% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 78.4519038076 59% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.