The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment. What are the causes of this? What can be done to solve this problem?
In modern days, more and more consumer goods are produced to meet the demands of the society; however, this mass production gradually leads to detrimental impacts on the environment. This issue must be taken into great consideration with practical solutions.
In reality, there is a number of reasons account for why an increase of manufacturing activities can cause environmental degradation. First of all, the more goods are produced, the more natural resources are depleted and more disasters may occur. For example, in Vietnam, to make one of our most used items: paper, 46% trees across the country are chopped down, resulted in severe deforestation. Moreover, hectares of forest lands are cleared with a view to constructing manufacturing factories. As a consequence, there comes flood washing the whole country away. Secondly, the process of producing any single good is sole contributor to pollutions, which affect badly our natural habitat. Factories often dump dirty water, used chemicals and oils, sewage, and cafeteria waste directly into the ground or into the seas, rivers, etc. For instance, Formosa - a manufactory in Vietnam - discharged toxic industrial waste into the ocean through drainage pipes, which polluted the water environment and acutely damaged marine system. Furthermore, smoke from factories can increase greenhouse gases, which lead to global warming. Most alarming, factories’ goods often contain great amount of plastic waste, posing hazardous threat to the environment as it’s non-biodegradable.
The environment is so harshly destroyed by the production of consumer goods that we have to put forward feasible solutions to end the issue. Firstly, the government should restrict the amount of raw materials that each factory needs to manufacture products. Local government area should charge or even imprison those overexploit natural resources such as wood, ore, etc. The charge can be raised higher to put manufacture companies under great pressure of going bankrupt. Secondly, the government should also have strict environment law, which ban factories from dumping unprocessed waste into natural habitat. Factories going against the law stand a chance of living behind bars lifelong. Moreover, factories must be encouraged to use environmentally-friendly materials and disposable packaging that can decompose much more easily than plastic. The government should enforce law on each household, each individual to follow the 3Rs: reduce, reuse and recycle to improve the environment’s situation.
In conclusion, manufacturing an increasing goods can pose significant threats to the environment because of illegal dumping, overexploitation,... To tackle this problem we have to take urgent actions instead of raising our demands to save the environment and save ourselves.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-11-08 | nguyenanh9182 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-28 | hieu13092006 | 89 | view |
| 2023-08-27 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-11 | quynhanhbuiviet | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-19 | hieu13092006 | 61 | view |
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 95
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In modern days, more and more consumer g...
^^^^
Line 2, column 993, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...es, which polluted the water environment and acutely damaged marine system. Furth...
^^
Line 2, column 1272, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... environment as it’s non-biodegradable. The environment is so harshly destroyed ...
^^^
Line 4, column 44, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'good'?
Suggestion: good
...conclusion, manufacturing an increasing goods can pose significant threats to the env...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...use of illegal dumping, overexploitation,... To tackle this problem we have to tak...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2397.0 1615.20841683 148% => OK
No of words: 420.0 315.596192385 133% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70714285714 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52701905584 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18636857218 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 255.0 176.041082164 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607142857143 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 739.8 506.74238477 146% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.3905659156 49.4020404114 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.954545455 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0909090909 20.7667163134 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.95454545455 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226039193245 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0564524404937 0.084324248473 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0440805625569 0.0667982634062 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144348889148 0.151304729494 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0318961496511 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.58 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.