Our current lifestyle has a negative impact on our future generation. Do you agree or disagree?
I believe that our way of dealing with the current situation will have negative consequences on our future generation. Their lives would be more difficult and different from ours, and they might face darker effects because of the reasons that I will present in subsequent essays.
First of all, we are experiencing extreme deforestation without restoring it. It leads to cutting down of excessive numbers of trees and converting the forest area into human habitats and major cities. As a result, our future generations will not able to be close to nature nor will they be able to breathe fresh air. Also, rapid industrialization takes a major role in exploiting and polluting our environment. As a result, in the future, our children are vulnerable to respiratory disease. To illustrate, in my hometown, comparing to the past, there were fewer children with respiratory illness but nowadays, most of the children are suffering from harmful ailments. New York Times has reported that there is a 30% increase in children with the disease and it is more likely to increase in the future. Thus, my example shows how our current situation is effecting our future generation.
As a result of increasing population and urbanization, there is a decrease in playgrounds so, children tend to stay home and get attached to technology such as video games, mobile phones, and televisions. Consequently, it has negative impacts on their eyes and mental growth. For example, during my childhood days, my friends and I used to go camping and enjoy nature but now the story is completely different as they do not have access to the natural environment. Besides this, we are witnessing bad food habits such as frozen vegetables and processed foods also growing fast-food fondness among children leading to unhealthy food habits, obesity, and other health ailments. Had there been strict laws for urbanization and deforestation, we could have decreased the negative effects
In summation, because of our current lifestyles like deforestation and urbanization, we are putting the lives of next-generation in peril.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | pezhmanlamei | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-13 | jimHsu | 76 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 80 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
| 2023-12-07 | butterflyluo | 66 | view |
- Compare and contrast learning by doing to learning by reading In your opinion which is better Explain 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Most advertisements make products seem much better than they really are.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 90
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Compare and contrast learning by doing to learning by reading In your opinion which is better Explain 66
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 707, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ailments. Had there been strict laws for urbanization and deforestation, we could...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, first, if, so, thus, for example, such as, as a result, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 15.1003584229 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 9.8082437276 71% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 13.8261648746 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 11.0286738351 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 43.0788530466 77% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 52.1666666667 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.0752688172 198% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1766.0 1977.66487455 89% => OK
No of words: 338.0 407.700716846 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22485207101 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 4.48103885553 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0313361715 2.67179642975 113% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 212.727598566 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.579881656805 0.524837075471 110% => OK
syllable_count: 558.9 618.680645161 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 0.0 3.08781362007 0% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.51792114695 114% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.94265232975 142% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.1344086022 109% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.4309552451 48.9658058833 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.733333333 100.406767564 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5333333333 20.6045352989 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.45110844103 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.5376344086 18% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 11.8709677419 25% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.85842293907 259% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.88709677419 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.248584583091 0.236089414692 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.083409067233 0.076458572812 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.101351800792 0.0737576698707 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.162180572157 0.150856017488 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0650984228193 0.0645574589148 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 11.7677419355 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 58.1214874552 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.1575268817 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 10.9000537634 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.21 8.01818996416 115% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 86.8835125448 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.002688172 110% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.0537634409 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.247311828 107% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 76.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 23.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.