Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?
Television advertising directed towards young children (aged two to five) should not be allowed.
Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer.
Many people provide a firm opinion about whether television advertising directed towards the juvenile should be permitted or not. Therefore, it is undoubtedly a subject of intense debate in today's globe. As far as I am legitimately concerned, I genuinely believe that young children should not be permitted towards any sort of advertisement. To elaborate more on this specific topic, the following reasons and examples will be provided.
The most significant conspicuous reason to justify my point of view is those youngsters are not mature enough to carefully differentiate between the fake and ultimate reality. What I signify is that most of the youngsters are puzzled and are easily confused with the advertisements that they witness on TV. Most of the time, innocent children assume advertisement is truly real, and they would sincerely believe them undoubtedly. My personal life experience set a compelling example of what I mean. When I was 7 years old, I used to readily believe that chocolate that they are shown in the television ad as a huge and filled with extra caramel and waffles, but when my dear mom bought the one for me, I was extremely disappointed with my expectation of what I watched in a television advertisement. From that innocent day forward, my mother adequately explained to me about ads that are merely a lie to lure kids.
The second reason to substantiate and indicate my standpoint is that the behaviors of children would negatively be affected by the television advertisement. Having put differently, they would most likely follow whatever they discover on television and would sometimes lead to life-threatening behavior. For a notable instance, a couple of years back, an extremely popular TV cartoon advertisement about a boy who could fly and travel to many places was shown, but soon many children were seen acting like that cartoon boy therefore, they allegedly jumped from building thinking that they could fly too like the tv cartoon boy. Hence, many children were found dead, and the advertisement was blocked soon after.
In conclusion, because of the reasons mentioned above, I strongly believe children should not be directed towards the promotional advertisement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-23 | rezamousavi666 | 66 | view |
| 2020-01-11 | nusybah | 76 | view |
| 2020-01-05 | jiyakavya | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-30 | jason_linnil | 60 | view |
| 2019-12-27 | Bobby1987 | 86 | view |
- Compare and contrast learning by doing to learning by reading In your opinion which is better Explain 66
- In some countries, high school or college students have jobs. Do you think this is a good idea? Give reasons and details to support your answer. 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Successful people try new things and take risks rather than only do what they know how to do well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement?Always telling the truth is the most important consideration in any relationship between people.Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer. 73
- Ethanol fuel made from plants such as corn and sugar cane has been advocated by some people as an alternative to gasoline in the United States However many critics argue that ethanol is not a good replacement for gasoline for several reasons 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, second, so, therefore, i mean, in conclusion, sort of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 21.0 15.1003584229 139% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 9.8082437276 102% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 13.8261648746 94% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 38.0 43.0788530466 88% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 52.1666666667 77% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1869.0 1977.66487455 95% => OK
No of words: 357.0 407.700716846 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.23529411765 4.8611393121 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34677393335 4.48103885553 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08597546846 2.67179642975 116% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 212.727598566 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.554621848739 0.524837075471 106% => OK
syllable_count: 597.6 618.680645161 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.51630824373 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 9.59856630824 94% => OK
Article: 5.0 3.08781362007 162% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 1.86738351254 214% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.94265232975 81% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.1344086022 114% => OK
Sentence length SD: 71.321992868 48.9658058833 146% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.6 100.406767564 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8 20.6045352989 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.45110844103 84% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 11.8709677419 51% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.85842293907 130% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.88709677419 82% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211721785699 0.236089414692 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.078756512859 0.076458572812 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0637515285846 0.0737576698707 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155736156899 0.150856017488 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0740233127353 0.0645574589148 115% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 11.7677419355 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 58.1214874552 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.10430107527 183% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.1575268817 132% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 10.9000537634 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 86.8835125448 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 10.002688172 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.0537634409 111% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.