A long with technological and science advances, there are variety problems raising from that. One of them is food problem. People debate whether this development is helpful for what we eat today or not. I will show you both sides of this question in order for you to comprehend it.
These following reasons represent why science has changed our food adversely. Firstly, science development allows us to create chemicals as well as addictives that are truly convenient and effective in producing and processing food. However, abusing these stuffs makes enormous negative effects on people's health. For instance, using insecticides superabundantly of the farmers leads depositing residue of chemicals in vegetables and fruits. Such produces cause serious health risks such as cancer, Parkinson, etc. Secondly, modern cooking appliances gradually form a habit of reusing lefovers. People usually preserve our leftovers in refrigerator and use again on the next day. This cause loss of some nutrients, particularly vitamins. Eating a lot of these foods has been linked with some cancers. Finally food producing these days changes in flavor and texture due to storage or freezing. Moreover, there are many industries bringing products with poor quality of processing. This is not safe for human consumption, so it is advisable to be a wise consumer and try to know more about the food you buy rather than the price.
On the one hand, it is clear that technological and science advancements would create several advantages for people's food. First and foremost, Cooking machines are getting more and more popular because they make complicated dishes in record time, even if we aren't the best cooks. Cooking machines have become increasingly popular in kitchens. Generally speaking, we have less time to cook and come home tired from our daily grind. The last thing that we want to do is cook. Consequently, cooking machines have become more popular and their sales have skyrocketed in the past years. These machines are getting more and more advanced, and offer several different functions. Thanks to cooking machines, we can make complicated dishes without needing culinary skills. Next, scientists take the gene for a desired trait in one plant or animal, and they insert that gene into a cell of another plant or animal and create new kind of foods - genetically modified foods. The possible benefits of genetic engineering include more nutritious food, Tastier food, less use of pesticides, so on. Last but not least, modern agricultural machinery allows us to feed many more people than we could years ago. agricultural machinery has eased the physical workload on individual farmers. A distinct advantage of mechanized farming is that it allows one man, on one piece of machinery, harvest hundreds of acres in just a day.
In conclusion, everything has advantages as well as downsides. What we need to do is knowing how to bring into play the benefits that science brings to food problem today and limit its drawbacks.
- Many people believe that technological and science advance make food better whereas some others believe that because of it that food now is more harmful in people s life Discuss both views and say your opinion 84
- Question As you have had a long break and been free from school due to the worldwide spread of a new fatal disease you may have a chance to reflect on many diferent things in life What do you think are the positive and negative aspects found revealed in b 73
- Discuss the advantages and disadvantages of using facebook as a means of online instruction You may compare with other tools like zoom etc Relevant examples of your own experience can be included 61
- Right attitude and specific actions related to the Corana pandemic these days 67
- Advantages of raising pets for children 67
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...oods has been linked with some cancers. Finally food producing these days changes in fl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...cated dishes in record time, even if we arent the best cooks. Cooking machines have b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...tting more and more advanced, and offer several different functions. Thanks to cooking machines, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Agricultural
...ny more people than we could years ago. agricultural machinery has eased the physical worklo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...s well as downsides. What we need to do is knowing how to bring into play the benefits tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s well as downsides. What we need to do is knowing how to bring into play the benefits tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76761243182 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 16.0721442886 193% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2864657449 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8064516129 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7419354839 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90322580645 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211021857843 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050573040094 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474900047611 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11651281389 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396894599232 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 802, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Finally,
...oods has been linked with some cancers. Finally food producing these days changes in fl...
^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 258, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: aren't
...cated dishes in record time, even if we arent the best cooks. Cooking machines have b...
^^^^^
Line 4, column 643, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'several'.
Suggestion: several
...tting more and more advanced, and offer several different functions. Thanks to cooking machines, ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1193, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Agricultural
...ny more people than we could years ago. agricultural machinery has eased the physical worklo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: NON_ACTION_CONTINUOUS[3]
Message: The verb know is usually not used with a continuous form, use the simple form instead. Suggestion: 'knows'
Suggestion: knows
...s well as downsides. What we need to do is knowing how to bring into play the benefits tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...s well as downsides. What we need to do is knowing how to bring into play the benefits tha...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, well, for instance, in conclusion, kind of, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 22.0 10.4138276553 211% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 54.0 41.998997996 129% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2536.0 1615.20841683 157% => OK
No of words: 488.0 315.596192385 155% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.19672131148 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.70007681154 4.20363070211 112% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76761243182 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 286.0 176.041082164 162% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58606557377 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 794.7 506.74238477 157% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 31.0 16.0721442886 193% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.2975951904 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2864657449 49.4020404114 73% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.8064516129 106.682146367 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.7419354839 20.7667163134 76% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.90322580645 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.211021857843 0.244688304435 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.050573040094 0.084324248473 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474900047611 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11651281389 0.151304729494 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0396894599232 0.056905535591 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.9 13.0946893788 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 50.2224549098 112% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.58 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.52 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 128.0 78.4519038076 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.1190380762 79% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.