Graffiti
The professor strongly disagree with the author of the text that he shared with his studens. He belives that Graffiti can not be called Art, and explain his point of view with several reasons.
Firts, the lecturer states that grafitti artists are actually breaking the law, and destroying private and public spaces, istead of expressing themselves artistically, as the author says. Furthermore, neigborhoods with that kind of intervention has higher crime rates and lower values for their propiertorships.
The reading inform us abut the famous artist Christo and how he had transform ordinary scenes into beautifull and interesting pieces of art. However, the professor thinks that it is not fair to compare Christo with many young poeple writing their nicknames on the walls, they are just criminal artis. Besides, it is not the same, because Christo get permission for ussing the spaces and his art is always removed by himself, after a couple of weeks, while, in the orther hand, ordinary name tags will be there for years.
The professor also indicates that we should ecourage grafitti artist to take part in other forms of “real" art, for example teaching them to paint murals.
In order to avoid misconceptions, we need to crearly states diferences between artist, for instance Christo, and vandalism: people who are definetly destroying private and public spaces with aerosol paint and marking pencils.
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 66
- Some students prefer classes with frequent discussions between the professor and the students with almost no lectures. Other students prefer classes with many lectures and almost no discussions. Which do you prefer? Use specific reasons and examples to su 60
- comics 66
- ecoturism 3
- Students at universities often have a choice of places to live. They may choose to live in university dormitories, or they may choose to live in apartments in the community. Compare the advantages of living in university housi 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: HAD_VBP[1]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'transformed'.
Suggestion: transformed
...he famous artist Christo and how he had transform ordinary scenes into beautifull and int...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 69, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'transformed'.
Suggestion: transformed
...he famous artist Christo and how he had transform ordinary scenes into beautifull and int...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...i artist to take part in other forms of “real' art, for example teaching the...
^
Line 9, column 132, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...instance Christo, and vandalism: people who are definetly destroying private and public...
^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 227, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...with aerosol paint and marking pencils.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, so, while, for example, for instance, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.4613686534 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 5.04856512141 79% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 12.0772626932 58% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 23.0 22.412803532 103% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 30.3222958057 86% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 5.01324503311 40% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1205.0 1373.03311258 88% => OK
No of words: 227.0 270.72406181 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30837004405 5.08290768461 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88156143495 4.04702891845 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69612881701 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 145.348785872 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.660792951542 0.540411800872 122% => OK
syllable_count: 353.7 419.366225166 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 5.0 8.23620309051 61% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.25165562914 240% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 2.5761589404 116% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 13.0662251656 69% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 21.2450331126 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.2338232458 49.2860985944 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.888888889 110.228320801 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.2222222222 21.698381199 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.2222222222 7.06452816374 159% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.09492273731 122% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 4.19205298013 119% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 4.33554083885 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 4.45695364238 90% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0415308920294 0.272083759551 15% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0215114718754 0.0996497079465 22% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0608436305456 0.0662205650399 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0242248492438 0.162205337803 15% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0484496984877 0.0443174109184 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.3589403974 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 53.8541721854 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.0289183223 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.2367328918 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.42419426049 117% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 10.7273730684 103% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.498013245 114% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.2008830022 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 3.33333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.