The powerful are most respected not when they exercise their power, but when they refrain from exercising it.”
The famous saying, “with great power comes great responsibility comes to mind here”. Wielding a lot of power and knowing when to exercises them represents one of the hallmarks of respected people in the society. In line with this, I agree that respect can be accorded to people who choose to exercise restraints despite the surfeit amount of power they wield.
Societies should not be built totally on the praise of sycophants neither should people give in to the naysayers. It is common place that a lot people dread the idea of oppression from people who seemingly have some authority or an ounce of power over them. However, the idea that powerful people should always restrain might be problematic. This is due to the fact that, a lot of people would be insolent or at worst, not fear the damning effects of their attitudes they exude in the face of the powerful. For instance, how do one explain the rudeness that comes with attacking a public official taking a walk in during his leisure period owing to a bill he sponsored which in the attacker’s subjective view, they disagree with? While it is demanded that such official shows decorum, this allows for impetuousness on the part of the supposed weak.
Conversely, showing restraint is of course an esteemed value as it demonstrates empathy on the side of the powerful. Not all actions by people are deliberately meant at getting the powerful livid. Showing restraint leaves indelible mark on the part of the offender. Imagine the scenario of a popular celebrity that has been smeared by some detractors but choose to forgive at the decision of court or allowing the offenders face jail terms. Clearly, this would be an avenue for further augmentation of one’s status in front of the people.
In trying to make a nexus between the two scenarios described above, it is imperative that the case of deliberation be made on what the attitude of people should be towards powerful people, and that if powerful people choose to demonstrate their power, it should not be interpreted as callousness but rather, an effort should me made to understand the underlying details.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-08 | Olukayode | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-16 | joe12 | 50 | view |
| 2022-04-13 | joe12 | 16 | view |
| 2021-10-27 | Adedayobello | 50 | view |
| 2021-09-22 | samuelgreprep | 66 | view |
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering Country cannot be checked both it s economy and national indentity are endangered Bec 72
- A person who knowingly commits a crime has broken the social contract and should not retain any civil rights or the rights to benefit from his or her own labor 79
- The first step to self knowledge is rejection of the familiar 66
- A movie producer sent the following memo to the head of the movie studio We need to increase the funding for the movie working title by 10 in order to ensure a quality product As you know we are working with a First time director whose only previous exper 58
- The powerful are most respected not when they exercise their power but when they refrain from exercising it 50
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, conversely, however, if, so, while, for instance, of course
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 19.5258426966 77% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 12.4196629213 81% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 14.8657303371 47% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 33.0505617978 88% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 12.9106741573 23% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1776.0 2235.4752809 79% => OK
No of words: 362.0 442.535393258 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.90607734807 5.05705443957 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.55969084622 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71310098299 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 215.323595506 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563535911602 0.4932671777 114% => OK
syllable_count: 552.6 704.065955056 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 6.24550561798 128% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.99550561798 80% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.2370786517 74% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 23.0359550562 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 73.3574505797 60.3974514979 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.4 118.986275619 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 23.4991977007 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.26666666667 5.21951772744 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.97078651685 80% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 5.13820224719 117% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 4.83258426966 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216844732439 0.243740707755 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0686465992255 0.0831039109588 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816640817009 0.0758088955206 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138254203735 0.150359130593 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.104978958131 0.0667264976115 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 14.1392134831 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 48.8420337079 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.1639044944 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.38706741573 106% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 100.480337079 93% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 11.2143820225 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5/6 paragraphs with 3/4 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: reason 4. address both of the views presented for reason 4 (optional)
para 6: conclusion.
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.