table the prensent of national expenditure in Ireland, italy and spain
The table reveals information on the proportion of national expenditure in Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden, Turkey on three types of consumer items in 2002. Units are measured in percent (%).
From an overall perspective, there was a significant difference in the percentage of consumer goods that all countries spent most on was food, drinks and tobacco. Actually, the percentage of food, drink and tobacco appeared to be by far the highest one among the three selected groups. Nevertheless, the number of Leisure and education was found to be the lowest one, with under 5%.
Surprisingly, the percentage of food, drinks and tobacco in Turkey was consistently determined to be by far the largest one among the five chosen countries, with 32,14% which was followed by Ireland (28,91%) and Spain (18,8%). Conversely, Italy and Sweden seemed to be countries spent the lowest, with 16,36% and 15,77%, respectively. The number of Turkey spent on Leisure and education was found to be 4,35%, being significantly two times higher than that in Ireland (2.21%) and Spain (1,98%). Besides, Italy and Sweden spent 3,20% and 3,22%, in that order
It is interesting to note that the figure recorded clothing and footwear between 5,4% in Sweden and 9% in Italy . In countries with the remaining spent on clothing and footwear around 6,5%
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-07-06 | mylinh3001 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-19 | Giang Tran | 78 | view |
| 2023-02-15 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-07-08 | Trần Ánh Vy | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-27 | hungdotestbig | view |
- reasons of choosing a university 60
- the chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 67
- table the prensent of national expenditure in Ireland italy and spain 61
- The line graph reveals information on the amount of three kinds of spread margarine low fat and reduced spreads and butter which were consumed over 26 years from 1981 to 2007 67
- the pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of france 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 112, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...r between 5,4% in Sweden and 9% in Italy . In countries with the remaining spent ...
^^
Line 7, column 146, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... Italy . In countries with the remaining spent on clothing and footwear around 6,...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, besides, conversely, if, nevertheless
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 7.0 200% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 6.8 206% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1107.0 965.302439024 115% => OK
No of words: 215.0 196.424390244 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1488372093 4.92477711251 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.82921379641 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7438284911 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548837209302 0.547539520022 100% => OK
syllable_count: 317.7 283.868780488 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.4083962739 43.030603864 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.7 112.824112599 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 22.9334400587 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.7 5.23603664747 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.169224785783 0.215688989381 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0639722828287 0.103423049105 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0946718612551 0.0843802449381 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.116990090841 0.15604864568 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.111638837962 0.0819641961636 136% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.2329268293 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.06136585366 103% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.