Many people are copying famous celebrities from magazines and TV. Why is this happening.Do you think it is a good idea to copy celebrities?
Most people try to assimilate famous personalities from print and broadcast media. In my opinion, copying a high profile person is not beneficial to individuals and society. Moreover, there are numerous reasons related to this modern issue which will discuss in this essay.
To begin with, in the contemporary world, almost everyone loves to live a rich lifestyle like the personalities of the media world. This fancy and comfortable lifestyle attracts people, particularly youngsters, who mostly have vulnerable mindsets. For example, adolescents are attracted towards lavish living and fashion sense of media stars, which they believe that he or she looks like one of their favourite celebrities.
Furthermore, these highly influential media individuals have colossal fans following. Because of this, people try to replica the activities of their famous stars to increase their fan base. Consequently, this affection towards their following celebrity gives the chance to meet them and enhance the respect in society. Hence, this type of imitation gives an individual impression of a fancy world and gives acclamation to their work which is dedicated to the dearest media personality.
Although people follow their favourite celebrities for good reasons, they have detrimental effects on individual physical health and society. Firstly, children could relate themselves with these personalities and tried to perform deadly stunts. This type of duplication sometimes causes physical injury to the children. For instance, some news reports show that some children harm themselves in performing the action scenes at homes after watching action movies. Secondly, people are deeply rooted or influenced by their performances so that if they perform a criminal role in a movie or magazine they act like a criminal person and perform violent acts in a public. Thus, these influences put negative consequences for person physical or mental health as well as to the society.
Overall, it can be reiterated that duplication from famous personalities has disadvantages which impact a society and are deleterious to person growth.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-06 | Sewak Singh | 86 | view |
- Some people think that higher institutions should concentration more on academic subjects such as history and the physical sciences while others think that they should concentrate more on practical subjects such as car mechanics and cookery etc Discuss bo 89
- It is better for young to get advice from older people than young people Do you agree or disagree 78
- Older people usually think that life used to be better in the past Do you think they are right or wrong to think like that 78
- Some people think that new technology always improves the lives of workers Other people believe that it results in disadvantages for workers Discuss both opinion and give your own opinion 78
- Nowadays many people have access to computers on a wide basis and a large number of children play computer games What are the negative impacts of playing computer games and what can be done to minimise the bad effects 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, first, firstly, furthermore, hence, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, thus, well, as to, for example, for instance, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 24.0651302605 133% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1811.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.60681114551 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.94422198522 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.606811145511 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.9152210985 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.529411765 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4705882353 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.133011454773 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439744600724 0.084324248473 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414283881064 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0753628986029 0.151304729494 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448480340342 0.056905535591 79% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 12.4159519038 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 78.4519038076 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.