The charts show the percentage of people working in different sectors in town A and B in two years 1960 and 2010. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The line graph demonstrates two towns in terms of the proportion of people working in distinct categories, over a forty-year period, between 1960 and 2010.
It is clear from the graph that in 2010, services in town A accounted for the most significant percentage; however, in 1960 and at the similar period in town B, it experiences the lowest percentage.
It is interesting to mention that in Town A, while services saw a considerable growth from 29% to 64%, manufacturing and sales decreased dramatically to 20% to 16%, respectively from 1960 to 2010. As regard Town B, despite falling noticeably, manufacturing accounted for the highest percentage over the same period, while services and sales experienced a slight decline to 25% and 22%, respectively.
If we look at both town in two different period, in 1960, manufacturing invariably accounted for the highest percentage; however, the proportion in Town B is more remarkable in comparison in Town A. In addition, in 2010, while in Town A, services were the most popular category, in Town B, manufacturing accounted for over a half of a total percentage, which meant that it was comprised more workers than others.
- In some countries people waste a lot of food which is bought in shops and restaurants What do you think are the reasons What can be done to solve this problem 67
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 10
- Many people prefer to watch foreign films rather than locally produced films Why could this be Should governments give more financial support to local film industries 61
- the graph below shows the percentage of people of different age group who went cinema once a moth in Great Britain Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown 39
- The chart below show how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 983.0 965.302439024 102% => OK
No of words: 193.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0932642487 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72725689877 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19121354058 2.65546596893 120% => OK
Unique words: 100.0 106.607317073 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.518134715026 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 293.4 283.868780488 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.07073170732 467% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 6.0 8.94146341463 67% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 32.0 22.4926829268 142% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 18.1720175606 43.030603864 42% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 163.833333333 112.824112599 145% => OK
Words per sentence: 32.1666666667 22.9334400587 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.83333333333 5.23603664747 131% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.190467797297 0.215688989381 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.112201850343 0.103423049105 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610197008194 0.0843802449381 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134792139688 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0530142215051 0.0819641961636 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 13.2329268293 141% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.46 61.2550243902 77% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.83 11.4140731707 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.8 10.9970731707 135% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.