Today much of the food people eat gets transported from farms that are thousands of miles away. Some people believe it would be better for the environment and the economy if people only consumed food produced by local farmers. Would the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages?
These days, regardless of the dramatic impacts derived from purchasing foodstuff that are thousands of miles away, a group of individuals incline to agree that eating food yielded in the local area could have more positive outcomes for the environment’s conditions and the economic activities. Though there are numerous demerits from this statement, I strongly hold a belief that its merits eclipse its downsides.
On the one hand, there are a few rationales to explain why the consumption of the local food results in detrimental repercussions in the various aspects of human’s life. The first drawback is a shortage of new-emerging food experiences which is considered as one of the most crippling problems via eating local products. In fact, there is an increase in the number of citizens taking a long time to transform their tastes by virtue of not being intriguing for the local food which seems not to trigger far-reaching changes from time to time. Another fact is that the adverse problem of increasing the product’s cost without any hesitations from the local farmers because of insufficient commodities. As the product costs are accelerated, the consumers would take their expenditure into consideration prior to their purchases.
On the contrary, despite these downsides, the consumption of regional food could bring a variety of beneficial ramifications in terms of the environment and the economy. First and foremost, the upsurge of consuming food products makes a tremendous contribution to curbing the unemployment rate which has posed a multitude of impediments to the governments over the past few years. This prevailing phenomenon is to generate a host of works for people suffered from being unemployed. Hence, if this measure is implemented, not only will they be earned the amount of money to retain their life, but also enhance the strides of the national economy. In other words, by opting a plethora of foodstuffs for the consumption from places or shops which are far away, exerting detrimental impacts on the environment. The product of food which is transported from far-off destinations, have a predisposition to discharge a large influx of gases to the environment. More consequently, this would not only plunge the environment into utter destruction but also take its toll on people’s health condition.
In conclusion, as cited above, in spite of negative corollaries in respect of eating local products, I concur with the idea of consuming local foods are able to reap an array of benefits more than its disadvantages.
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do you think that the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- News is playing a vital role in our life today and people are getting much influenced by the news now Some say that news has no connection with most people s life and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspaper and watch television news program 78
- The diagram below shows the production of steam using a gas cooled nuclear reactor Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- In the past shopping was a routine domestic task Many people nowadays regard it as a hobby To what extent do you think this is a positive trend 84
- some people think that the government should be responsible for crime prevention while others believe that it is the responsibility of the individuals to protect themselves Discuss both views and give your opinion 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27872860636 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11183651904 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557457212714 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2437650207 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.933333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311752963069 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092312891545 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476262232657 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166402042729 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544490270282 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, hence, if, so, in conclusion, in fact, in other words, in spite of, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 70.0 41.998997996 167% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2159.0 1615.20841683 134% => OK
No of words: 409.0 315.596192385 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27872860636 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.49708221141 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11183651904 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 228.0 176.041082164 130% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557457212714 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 670.5 506.74238477 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 47.2437650207 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 143.933333333 106.682146367 135% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2666666667 20.7667163134 131% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.06120827912 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.311752963069 0.244688304435 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.092312891545 0.084324248473 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0476262232657 0.0667982634062 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.166402042729 0.151304729494 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0544490270282 0.056905535591 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 129.0 78.4519038076 164% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.