The line chart illustrates data on how many trips taken by British citizens to other nations for distinct intentions, measured in millions, over 12 years, starting from 1989.
Overall, it is clear that British residents preferred traveling abroad for holidays among other reasons. Additionally, the number of trips taken for vacations and family visits experienced larger variations compared to that of business and other purposes in the observed period.
More specifically, the number of trips for holidays was by far the largest figure in comparison with others in 1989, with roughly 30 million trips, rising significantly to 50 million, before dropping by 10 million trips in 2001. Meanwhile, despite starting at around 5 million trips in 1989, the figure for family visits gradually increased throughout the period, reaching over 10 million trips in 2001.
The number of foreign trips taken by UK citizens for business showed the least variation, fluctuating around 10 million trips over the research period. On the other hand, the figure for other intentions witnessed a different pattern compared to the previous one, which rose slightly from 4 million to 8 million in 1989 and 1995, respectively. However, by 1995, its figure had gradually fallen to only 2 million trips in 2001.
- The line graph shows the number of trips to other countries by UK residents for various purposes between 1989 and 2001 73
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in Japan and Malaysia in the year 2010. 78
- New technologies have changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 92
- The charts below show the proportion of people s total spending in a particular European country was spent on different commodities and services in 1958 and in 2008 78
- It is observed that in many countries not enough students are choosing to study science subjects What are causes And what will be effected on society 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, so, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1091.0 965.302439024 113% => OK
No of words: 205.0 196.424390244 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32195121951 4.92477711251 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78388967377 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73529381287 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 106.607317073 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.565853658537 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 310.5 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8520238986 43.030603864 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.375 112.824112599 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.625 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.125 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.321481447735 0.215688989381 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.150601815591 0.103423049105 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0372898112357 0.0843802449381 44% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200598452237 0.15604864568 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0273951873889 0.0819641961636 33% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 13.2329268293 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 54.56 61.2550243902 89% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.87 11.4140731707 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.11 8.06136585366 113% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 40.7170731707 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.