The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the amount of money spent on various study fields over a 29-year period in America, starting from 1980, measured in billions dollars.
Overall, it is clear that health section was most favored, with the largest expenditures that government spent on. While the expenditure spent on heath and other areas decreased, the other areas experience an increase throughout the examined years.
More specifically, despite starting at roughly 8 and 7 billion of dollars, the amount of money spent on health field and other subjects increased and reached their peaks at over 22 and 8 billions dollars in 2004 and 2000 respectively. However, U.S government had reduced the money in health section to 18 billions dollars by 2008. Meanwhile, the figure for other fields dropped by 2 billions dollars at the end of the period.
On the other hand, although energy and general science observed a fluctuated trend over the period, the amount of expenditure which was exploited for them reached 9 and 5 billions dollars respectively in 2008. Additionally, space research experienced a marginal growth in the expenditure, which reached approximately 9 billions dollars in the final observed year.
- The chart shows the percentage of the adult population employed in different categories in 2003 and 2013 78
- Many developing countries are currently expanding their tourist industries Why is this the case Is it a positive development 78
- The graph below shows the production levels of main fuels in a European country from 1981 to 2000 Measured in tonnes 84
- The charts shows air pollution levels by different causes among four countries in 2012 82
- The chart shows the proportion of renewable energy in total energy supply in 4 countries from 1997 to 2010 79
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 247, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: S
... 2004 and 2000 respectively. However, U.S government had reduced the money in hea...
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, while, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 33.7804878049 95% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1049.0 965.302439024 109% => OK
No of words: 199.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27135678392 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85139461514 2.65546596893 107% => OK
Unique words: 115.0 106.607317073 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577889447236 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1790543952 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.125 112.824112599 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.875 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.625 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109935052786 0.215688989381 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0553173321973 0.103423049105 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0536674090608 0.0843802449381 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0665801439731 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0575519937003 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 13.2329268293 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.58 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.06136585366 112% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 40.7170731707 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.