Smart Cars
The written passage and the lecture is about smart cars and their possible advantages and disadvantages. The author thinks overall that smart car technology will bring many benefits to drivers lifes and traffic stiuations itself, while the professor from the listening is highly skeptical to the points which have been introduced by the article.
To begin with, according to the writing passage, within the smart car innovation, in the future car accidents can be eliminated, it claims that there is no doubt that humans do poor job while driving, wheras the professor says, devices and technology can fail occasionaly which means when this failing occurs the amount of involvement by cars would be tremendous.
Secondly, the author claims that smart car technology can solve the traffic problem. Due to the fact that computer-based systems will project the speed of the cars and the other regulations will be made therefore, the commuters will spend less time on traffic. On the other hand, the lecturer says that this situation is far away from being happened, she continues by saying throughout the history people have been built a tendency to use more private cars and this will continue to happen. The more smart cars means there will be more commuters and more cars, since this is the fact the traffic problem would not be solved via smart cars technology.
Lastly, the author point outs that the budged-friendliness of the smart cars by claming there will be no expenses such as reparing breaks and tires since those mentioned cars are not depend on those insturement and they use programmes. However, the professor mentions that in the case of repairment, the smart cars require a great amount of money than the normal cars. This is because the technology which is using to upgrade the smart cars system is quite expensive. She also adds, overall cost would be much more higher than today’s available cars.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-17 | Julie.Zhu | 85 | view |
| 2022-12-27 | villian7 | 75 | view |
| 2022-12-24 | YAGUT | 78 | view |
| 2022-11-13 | Tanvayee15 | 73 | view |
| 2022-10-17 | Prabesh Dhakal | 73 | view |
- Nuclear power provides cheap and clean energy The benefits of nuclear technology far outweigh the disadvantages To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Although it s a new technology solar energy provides benefits to the entire world First solar energy eliminates our reliance on non renewable fossil fuels Additionally solar energy is non pollutant which makes it better for everyone Finally there is almos 73
- Car manufacturers and governments have been eagerly seeking a replacement for the automobile s main source of power the internal combustion engine 3
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps understand the present 84
- Some people think history has little or nothing to offer while others say the study of the past helps understand the present 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 184, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'depended'.
Suggestion: depended
...ires since those mentioned cars are not depend on those insturement and they use progr...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 511, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'higher' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: higher
...e also adds, overall cost would be much more higher than today’s available cars.
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, no doubt, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.4613686534 182% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 5.04856512141 257% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 7.30242825607 137% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 12.0772626932 99% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 22.412803532 94% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 30.3222958057 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.01324503311 100% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1373.03311258 117% => OK
No of words: 319.0 270.72406181 118% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04388714734 5.08290768461 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22617688928 4.04702891845 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61895669481 2.5805825403 101% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 145.348785872 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.529780564263 0.540411800872 98% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 419.366225166 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.55342163355 97% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 9.0 8.23620309051 109% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.51434878587 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 2.5761589404 233% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 13.0662251656 84% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 21.2450331126 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.9446693997 49.2860985944 168% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.272727273 110.228320801 133% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.0 21.698381199 134% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.7272727273 7.06452816374 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 4.19205298013 48% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 4.33554083885 185% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 4.45695364238 22% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.27373068433 47% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.472317538943 0.272083759551 174% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.231475794202 0.0996497079465 232% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.120012202368 0.0662205650399 181% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.328573323223 0.162205337803 203% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0371869581594 0.0443174109184 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.3589403974 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.5 53.8541721854 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.0289183223 121% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.2367328918 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 63.6247240618 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 19.5 10.7273730684 182% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.498013245 130% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 24.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.