Some people say that the best way to improve public health is by increasing the number of sports facilities. Others, however, say that this would have little effect on public health and that other measures are required.
In this day and age, the lower level of health among human beings is a heated issue which frequently gehnerates a large number of dilemmas. Some people are of the view that increasing the amount of sports facilities is the optimum option to ameliorate the community well-being while others hold the view that this may be a bit more useless to keep people healthy than other tactics expected to be more effective. Both sides of this argument will be clarified with relevant examples before a reasoned conclusion is decided upon.
On the one and, introducing the greater number of sport facilities comprises many vantages. In addition to gyms require entry fees which means only people with enough money to enter can go, the construction of exercise equipments in parks and gardens is one of the highest backbones to foster them to be healthful. To clarify, they can utilize these sport facilities installed in parks as a part of their entertainment there. Therefore, approaching every person live in a certain country takes the rein their health regularly unintentionally.
On the other hand, curiosity in sports is not found in everybody as well as these sports facilities might just attract people to get fit mostly. Furthermore, attending gyms, utilizing sports facilities do not mean not eating high fat foodstuffs. For example, much as some people do exercise and go to gyms, they may not give up savouring fast food, sweets, sugery snacks which are known to increase the risk of obesity and contribute to poor health. Thus, some agree that instead of striving to revise the sport facilities, the government should rein the amount of sales of above-mentioned unhealthy food products at a certain limit, and motivate people to consume food considered healthy and advertise the both importance and benefit of them to their body. These prospects may provide a gain in their wellness more rather than revamp sport facilities.
The minor opposing arguments regarding the great supply of sports facilities to the public will never deter us from concluding that for many years, training with sports is regarded as the impetus to rejuvenate our heart. And springing up more sport facilities is a win-win both for the people's health and pocket.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-10-25 | MinyiChu | 61 | view |
2023-07-14 | Ediyorbek521 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2023-07-02 | lydia231232 | 89 | view |
2022-11-24 | Alili | 67 | view |
- In many parts of the world people now often throw things away when they are broken and buy new ones whereas in the past broken things were repaired and used again Why do you think this is the case What problems may it lead to 54
- The pie charts show sources which were used to generate electricity in Uzbekistan in 1980 and 1990
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 61
- The pictures below shows the recycling process wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The pictures below shows the recycling process wasted glass bottles Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 113, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...eated issue which frequently gehnerates a large number of dilemmas. Some people are of the view t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...a reasoned conclusion is decided upon. On the one and, introducing the greater ...
^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...heir health regularly unintentionally. On the other hand, curiosity in sports i...
^^^
Line 3, column 818, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ay provide a gain in their wellness more rather than revamp sport facilities. ...
^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... rather than revamp sport facilities. The minor opposing arguments regarding t...
^^^
Line 4, column 151, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... us from concluding that for many years, training with sports is regarded as the ...
^^
Line 4, column 290, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'peoples'' or 'people's'?
Suggestion: peoples'; people's
...rt facilities is a win-win both for the peoples health and pocket.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, may, regarding, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in addition, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1873.0 1615.20841683 116% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06216216216 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72734843953 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.57027027027 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 583.2 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.7684581677 49.4020404114 141% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.785714286 106.682146367 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4285714286 20.7667163134 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.07142857143 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.241764485511 0.244688304435 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0782820976736 0.084324248473 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0432981228076 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141190882422 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0245915403875 0.056905535591 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.0946893788 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 50.2224549098 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.19 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.