TPO Extra 2- integrated
smarts cars are faster, safer, and cheaper.
The article asserts that state-of-the-art, autonomous cars are safer, faster, and more economical for their owners. The professor, on the other hand, overthrows the author's explanations and claims that their benefits are vague even if they meet some of their expectations. In the following, her justifications, used to shed light on this convoluted controversy, will be discussed thoroughly.
First of all, the essay insists that smart cars can prevent accidents and collisions as they have supplement sensors guiding them. The lecturer refutes this notion, mainly because she believes that some accidents can occur as these technologically advanced cars might fail occasionally. Since the traffics would be more packed because of these cars, there would be more pile ups after accidents with more cars. This is worse than usual accidents which happen nowadays. Therefore, there is no reason to accept that these smart cars can ensure trips without humans' injuries and accidents.
Secondly, the passage declares that there would not be any traffic issues as these cars can follow each other at a constant speed. The teacher says that this option will not eventually decrease commuting times. Usually, the introduction of a new convenient medium attracts more people to benefit from that. Thusmore people will use these cars. Additional cars will prevent their owners to take advantage of high speed journies.
Tertiary, the reading upholds that these cars reduce the expenses of driving as their programs can find the most optimized routs, so less money is neede for their repairs. The educator, however, opposes this idea because she claims that these new innovations have their own extra expenses. Utilizing them will require other technologies, such as sensors, which can cause more money to spend on. Moreover, the replacement of these cars' pieces is more expensive in comparison with regural and conventional cars.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-05-20 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 80 | view |
2020-02-23 | farzaddanaeii | 3 | view |
2019-03-07 | simin.n | 73 | view |
2018-11-14 | raniamekhaiel | 3 | view |
- The disadvantages of reducing work hours 85
- the decrease in native Eastern Island population for three main reasons:deforestationratsa fight between long-eared and short-eared people. 80
- TPO 18 Integrated Toreyya trees are endangered and there are three ways to preserve them first reestablish them in the same location in which it lived for 1000 years second move them to another location far from its Florida microclimate third preserve it 80
- TPO 36 independent agree or not for the successful development of a country it is more important for a government to spend money on the education of very young children than to spend money on universities 80
- The article asserts that working in a four day workweek setting is extremely beneficial for both companies and employees However the lecturer completely disagrees with this idea and rejects all three reasons mentioned in the passage His opposite explanati 80
No. of Words: 302 250
Write the essay in 20 minutes.
Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 25 in 30
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 17 12
No. of Words: 302 250
No. of Characters: 1578 1200
No. of Different Words: 178 150
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.169 4.2
Average Word Length: 5.225 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.58 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 105 80
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 84 60
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 58 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 37 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17.765 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.61 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.471 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.314 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.514 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.11 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 4 4