crazy yellow ants elimination in palm forest
The passage presents some possible solutions to the crisis of crazy yellow ants threatening the ecosystem of a unique palm forest. The lecturer disregards all the points made in the article, and she claims none of the proposed solutions are practical. Her further demonstrations are as follows.
Firstly, while chemically toxic ant traps can indeed kill crazy yellow ants, they cannot differentiate between these crazy yellow ants and other native ant species. The island near Australia which is mentioned in the text did not have any other ant species. By contrast, the palm forest is home to other ant species that we aim to protect, not harm. Utilizing the toxic ant traps would kill other ant species, and consequently, endanger the ecosystem.
Secondly, although broad-leaved trees are a kind of preferred habitat for crazy yellow ants, this ant species can thrive in several other environments such as open fields that are greatly exposed to sunlight. Thus, cutting down broad-leaved trees might exclude one type of favorable habitat for crazy yellow ants, but it also presents another suitable environment for their population surge; the sunlight-enriched open field inside the forest.
Finally, reducing human activity near palm forest might indeed cause a decrease in the crazy yellow ants population to some degree, it imposes a destructive effect on the economy of the region. Most of the income in that region comes from tourism and visits from scientists who are planning to examine and observe the unique animal and plant species in the palm forest. Hence, by limiting human activity in the area, the revenue of the natives and that region collectively faces restraints as well.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-18 | Seyed Armin Mirhosseini | 83 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 101, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'ants'' or 'ant's'?
Suggestion: ants'; ant's
...ed cause a decrease in the crazy yellow ants population to some degree, it imposes a...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, kind of, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.4613686534 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 5.04856512141 119% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 7.30242825607 110% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 12.0772626932 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 22.412803532 58% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 30.3222958057 102% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.01324503311 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1429.0 1373.03311258 104% => OK
No of words: 273.0 270.72406181 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23443223443 5.08290768461 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 4.04702891845 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68771130908 2.5805825403 104% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 145.348785872 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.540411800872 106% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 419.366225166 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.55342163355 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 3.25607064018 123% => OK
Article: 6.0 8.23620309051 73% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.25165562914 160% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.51434878587 198% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 2.5761589404 78% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 13.0662251656 92% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 21.2450331126 104% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.6529485573 49.2860985944 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.083333333 110.228320801 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.75 21.698381199 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.83333333333 7.06452816374 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.09492273731 98% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 4.19205298013 24% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 4.33554083885 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 4.45695364238 157% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.27373068433 70% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.430787880304 0.272083759551 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.151928249419 0.0996497079465 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129799660301 0.0662205650399 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.251012808017 0.162205337803 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0648075712613 0.0443174109184 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.3589403974 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.8541721854 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 5.55761589404 158% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.0289183223 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.35 12.2367328918 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.83 8.42419426049 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 63.6247240618 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.7273730684 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.498013245 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.2008830022 80% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 83.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 25.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.