People who make decisions based on emotion and justify decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, you should consider ways in which the statement might or might not hold true and explain how these considerations shape your position.
A person is always faced with the dilemma of whether to take a decision practically or emotionally. People who make decisions based on emotion and justify decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. I agree with this statement and I put forward the reasoning behind my position in the paragraph below .
Firstly, we have all come across situations wherein we feel hopeless, think that our luck is running out and we are not going anywhere in life. Such kind of situations cause a human to fall for psychic practices like tarot readers and other religious methods. These miscreants pry upon dejected souls and take advantage of people in peril. Owing to this people end up loosing money in the form of scams or blackmailing. It sometimes does happen that people attribute their success to such practices but in reality, and in my opinion, their success is a result of their own hard-work rather that their false and emotional beliefs on psychic practices.
Secondly, a leader of a company or the leader of a country has to take practical and informed decisions rather than decisions that ride upon emotions. For example, a project leader of a certain team requires a new software for his team. Owing to the problems his immediate brother is facing in terms of his business in the software sector and to boost his business, the project leader gives the order for the software to his brothers company. Such a decision could later come back to haunt the project leader if his brother is unable to deliver the software and consequently it would also mean that the project leader looses his job. The decision made by the project leader was purely based on emotions and a logical explanation afterwards would bear no relevance.
Lastly, individuals in an army have to always take into account the practicality of every decision that they make on a battlefield. A prime example would be the situation during the second world war. A group of mathematicians working for the british army finally understood the working of Enigma, a german encryption machine which they used to send secret messages. The first message which the british team decoded was an air-strike on one of the it's ships. The commander of the ship was brother of one of the mathematician. So emotionally he thought of informing the ship. But such an approach would have alerted the germans that enigma was no more a secret device and they would have changed it with something far superior. The team went against informing the ship. And even though the mathematician lost his brother, at the end of the day, that decision and their collective effort helped cut down the duration of the war by two years. The practical thinking and the logic behind it, helped them to make a reasoned decision.
In sum, I am a strong advocate of the statement that people who make decisions based on emotion and justify decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. The world we live in needs a pragmatic mindset and emotional decisions can later comeback to haunt a person even if he or she justifies it with a logical reasoning.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-30 | yixova3193 | 66 | view |
| 2023-10-09 | Truss | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-04 | Adesina Boluwatito | 50 | view |
| 2023-10-01 | shamika@25 | 50 | view |
| 2023-09-14 | RIYA MODI | 58 | view |
- A pet food company recalled 4 million pounds of pet food in response to complaints that pets that had consumed the food experienced vomiting lethargy and other signs of illness After the recall the pet food company tested samples from the recalled food an 53
- In any field of endeavor it is impossible to make a significant contribution without first being strongly influenced by past achievements within that field Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement 66
- Fifteen years ago Omega University implemented a new procedure that encouraged students to evaluate the teaching effectiveness of all their professors Since that time Omega professors have begun to assign higher grades in their classes and overall student 68
- The following argument was made in a newspaper editorial The autonomy of any country is based on the strength of its borders if the number of illegal immigrants entering a country cannot be checked both its economy and national identity are endangered Bec 75
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 68
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 315, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...ehind my position in the paragraph below . Firstly, we have all come across sit...
^^
Line 3, column 350, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... advantage of people in peril. Owing to this people end up loosing money in the form...
^^^^
Line 7, column 444, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'its'?
Suggestion: the; its
...eam decoded was an air-strike on one of the its ships. The commander of the ship was br...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, finally, first, firstly, if, lastly, second, secondly, so, as to, for example, kind of, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 19.5258426966 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.3162921348 115% => OK
Pronoun: 48.0 33.0505617978 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 73.0 58.6224719101 125% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 12.9106741573 77% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2576.0 2235.4752809 115% => OK
No of words: 531.0 442.535393258 120% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85122410546 5.05705443957 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.80035803286 4.55969084622 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.65114637125 2.79657885939 95% => OK
Unique words: 262.0 215.323595506 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.4934086629 0.4932671777 100% => OK
syllable_count: 814.5 704.065955056 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59117977528 94% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 13.0 4.99550561798 260% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 3.10617977528 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 1.77640449438 169% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 25.0 20.2370786517 124% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 23.0359550562 91% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.8112446061 60.3974514979 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.04 118.986275619 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.24 23.4991977007 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.04 5.21951772744 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 7.80617977528 38% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 10.2758426966 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.326253304159 0.243740707755 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0944255920659 0.0831039109588 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.135127553338 0.0758088955206 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.231507770598 0.150359130593 154% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.179888433499 0.0667264976115 270% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 14.1392134831 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 48.8420337079 120% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 12.1639044944 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.98 8.38706741573 95% => OK
difficult_words: 111.0 100.480337079 110% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.8971910112 88% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 11.2143820225 93% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 54.17 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.25 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.