The bar chart gives information about the area where people mostly accessed the Internet from 1998 to 2004 in the UK.
Overall, it is clear that UK saw a significant fluctuation in the locations where people used the Internet between 1998 and 2004. In addition, library is the area where inhabitants surfed the Internet at least over the period.
In 1998, about 55 % people accessed the Internet at home while the percentage of people using the Internet at work and in college were lower, at about 28%, 20% respectively. The figure for the Internet users at library was the lowest, at about 12%.
On the other hand, the percentage of people accessing the Internet at work decreased from about 25% in 2002 to about 16% in 2004. This trend was similar with the figure for the Internet users in college, which declined by 2%. In contrast, the proportion of people who used the Internet rose to about 16 %. The percentage for people surfing the Internet at work still remained at about 55% after a decline in 2000.
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- Writing task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 78
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- In most successful organisations some people believe that communication between managers and workers is important while other people said that other factors are more significant What is your opinion 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 131, Rule ID: WERE_VBB[1]
Message: Did you mean 'where' or 'we'?
Suggestion: where; we
...ing the Internet at work and in college were lower, at about 28%, 20% respectively. ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, still, while, at least, in addition, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.15609756098 190% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 33.7804878049 121% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 835.0 965.302439024 87% => OK
No of words: 177.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.71751412429 4.92477711251 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64748333727 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.46955179304 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.519774011299 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 252.9 283.868780488 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.7092706668 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.7777777778 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6666666667 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.88888888889 5.23603664747 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217246788755 0.215688989381 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.117360760101 0.103423049105 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0647044162544 0.0843802449381 77% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.173205448087 0.15604864568 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0624890871255 0.0819641961636 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.6 13.2329268293 80% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.1 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.17 8.06136585366 89% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.4329268293 96% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.