In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry.
Why is this the case?
What can be done about this problem?
Regardless of the new improvements and developments made in agriculture, people around the globe are still starving. This essay examines the reasons for this issue and a solution to curb this crisis.
There are many reasons why individuals still lack sufficient food despite enormous technological developments in the agricultural sector. One of the reasons is the governments non-challant attitude and lack of investments towards agriculture. For instance, in Nigeria, the governments budget for the agriculture sector is about 0.8% according to the 2020 Nigerian National Budget, which is significantly lower compared to the 10.5% allocated for the refurbishment of the presidential villa. Ultimately, this shows an absolute lack of priority, interest and zeal in the development of agriculture in the country. Thus, a contributory factor to starvation in the land.
A solution to this issue is for governments globally to invest greatly in agriculture and make it a key part of the nations objectives to alleviate hunger in the society. With adequate investments in new developments associated with agriculture, the government will be able to assist and encourage small-scale farmers financially, so as to evolve them into large-scale farming. This will invariably lead to the creation of sufficient food and livestock.
In addition, a part of the government investments can include the availability of plots of land at a subsidised rate for dedicated and interested farmers. This will ultimately motivate individuals to venture into the agriculture business. Consequently, the issue of hunger in the land will be quickly be forgotten.
To sum up, the causes of widespread hunger globally despite improvements in agriculture is as a result of the lack of government interest and proper investments in the agriculture sector. However, a solution to mitigate these effects is for governments around the world to view agriculture as a top priority to curb starvation in the society and invest sufficiently in agricultural businesses.
- Men do most of the high level jobs Should the government encourage a certain percentage of these jobs to be reserved for women What is your opinion on that 61
- Some people prefer to spend their lives doing the same things and avoiding changes Other however think that change is always a good thing Discuss both views and give your opinion 81
- An increasing trend nowadays is for young adults to play computer games Some people say is a negative development Discuss and give your opinion 65
- The position of women in society has changed markedly in the last twenty years Many of the problems young people now experience such as juvenile delinquency arise from the fact that many married women now work and are not at home to care for their childre 73
- Some people think that universities should provide graduates with the knowledge and skills needed in the workplace Others think that the true function of a university should be to give access to knowledge for its own sake regardless of whether the course 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 332, Rule ID: SO_AS_TO[1]
Message: Use simply 'to'
Suggestion: to
...ourage small-scale farmers financially, so as to evolve them into large-scale farming. T...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, so, still, thus, as to, for instance, in addition, as a result, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1734.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 312.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55769230769 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20279927342 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.40153961158 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.490384615385 0.561755894193 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 8.0 2.52805611222 316% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.328402151 49.4020404114 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.6 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.214731002993 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0769148788101 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0530034971258 0.0667982634062 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.132846007872 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0592104170782 0.056905535591 104% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.97 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.13 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.