All university students should be required to take history courses no matter what their field of study is.
Throughout the teaching history in universities, students have required to take some special cources, such as history, in their education schedule despite they are related to their lessons or not. Although some teachers believe that all students should take some unrelated courses, such as history, I do believe that all of them who are not study the special content such as history should not take history classes no matter what their field is, on which I will elaborate my reasons in the subsequent paragraphs.
Firstly, students have a limited time to allocate their lessons, so they should concentrate on lessons providing better educational consequences. To be more specific, students at universities are bombared with lentghy lectures and hefty assignments that needs a considerable amount of students time and focus. In this regard, students attempt to organize their time with the courses relating to their field to eliminate the disruptive courses and have better overlap amid their lessons. In contrast, taking courses that are completing different from the main field waste a great amount of their time since the research process are different, not related to their main field, and attract most of the students energy and time. For instance, last year, I had three difficult exam in the mechanic engineering department that were vital to my education, but I had to allocate half of my study time to my history class since I had to visit an historical places in an other city and I failed my major exams in mechanic department. If I had not participate in the history class, I have been able to pass my major exams properly.
Secondly, finance plays a pivotal rule on students education process, the more courses taken, the more money spent. To be more precise, students enter the schools to bring a prosperous and successful future for themselves, so they attempt to attend in courses that provide better job position in their professional life. In this regard, when universities have students to attend in history classes, they should to expense extra money to get classes that are related to their career and are prohibited due to history classes. Extra classes need a large amount of money that needs to be provided individually, most the students have financial help, but for extra courses they have to effort individually, and restrict their consentration on their lessons since need to find part time job and get the money. Had the history classes been forced, the students would not be enforced to find job and distracted from their lessons.
To sum up, I do believe that classes like history, which is not related to most students' field, should be omitted. Not only do they would eliminate students concentration from their lessons, but it also will create a significant amount of concerns due to financial aspects.
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Two people can still become good friends if one of them has more money than the other one does 85
- Some lessons for young students increase their interest to learn including video games But some people believe it will distract young students What is your opinion Why 88
- Students can learn as much by watching films as they learn by reading books 91
- The government wants to fund the following to improve children s education 1 Hire more teachers to teach in a small class 2 Provide preschool education before kindergarten 3 To provide some training courses so that teachers can be more professional 76
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement It is more important for students to study art and literature than it is to study math and science Provide reasons and examples to support your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 700, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...eir main field, and attract most of the students energy and time. For instance, last yea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 773, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'exam' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'exams'.
Suggestion: exams
...tance, last year, I had three difficult exam in the mechanic engineering department ...
^^^^
Line 4, column 949, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'place'?
Suggestion: place
...lass since I had to visit an historical places in an other city and I failed my major ...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 959, Rule ID: AN_OTHER[1]
Message: Did you mean 'another'? This word sequence is usually spelled together.
Suggestion: another
... I had to visit an historical places in an other city and I failed my major exams in mec...
^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1038, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'participated'.
Suggestion: participated
...ms in mechanic department. If I had not participate in the history class, I have been able ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 43, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...condly, finance plays a pivotal rule on students education process, the more courses tak...
^^^^^^^^
Line 6, column 773, Rule ID: EN_COMPOUNDS
Message: This word is normally spelled with hyphen.
Suggestion: part-time
...ion on their lessons since need to find part time job and get the money. Had the history ...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, second, secondly, so, for instance, in contrast, such as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 15.1003584229 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 9.8082437276 112% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 13.8261648746 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 13.0 11.0286738351 118% => OK
Pronoun: 50.0 43.0788530466 116% => OK
Preposition: 66.0 52.1666666667 127% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.0752688172 124% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2379.0 1977.66487455 120% => OK
No of words: 469.0 407.700716846 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07249466951 4.8611393121 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.65364457471 4.48103885553 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70642809334 2.67179642975 101% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 212.727598566 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.443496801706 0.524837075471 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 740.7 618.680645161 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 9.59856630824 52% => OK
Article: 3.0 3.08781362007 97% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 5.0 1.86738351254 268% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.94265232975 182% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 20.6003584229 73% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 20.1344086022 154% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.9041104866 48.9658058833 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 158.6 100.406767564 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2666666667 20.6045352989 152% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53333333333 5.45110844103 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.53405017921 88% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.5376344086 126% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 11.8709677419 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.85842293907 104% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.88709677419 61% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.414581306704 0.236089414692 176% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.141495373055 0.076458572812 185% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0827936650367 0.0737576698707 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.25028851708 0.150856017488 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0881784611245 0.0645574589148 137% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.1 11.7677419355 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.01 58.1214874552 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.10430107527 144% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.1575268817 152% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.72 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.01818996416 109% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 86.8835125448 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.0 10.002688172 180% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.0537634409 143% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.247311828 88% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Better to have 5 paragraphs with 3 arguments. And try always support/against one side but compare two sides, like this:
para 1: introduction
para 2: reason 1. address both of the views presented for reason 1
para 3: reason 2. address both of the views presented for reason 2
para 4: reason 3. address both of the views presented for reason 3
para 5: conclusion.
So how to find out those reasons. There is a formula:
reasons == advantages or
reasons == disadvantages
for example, we can always apply 'save time', 'save/make money', 'find a job', 'make friends', 'get more information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
or we can apply 'waste time', 'waste money', 'no job', 'make bad friends', 'get bad information' as reasons to all essay/speaking topics.
Rates: 73.3333333333 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 22.0 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.