It is irrefutable that communication sector is being dominated by internet and text messages in recent times. Since people are becoming more obsessed with this mode of communication, there remains a potential risk of obsolescence of face to face interaction. In my opinion, although internet based communication may experience an increase in its popularity, it will not be able to perish the traditional means of conversation.
To begin with, internet has become ubiquitous these days and blessed the humanity with lots of gifts. One of them is the unprecedented development in the communication field. This is because internet has done the unthinkable by expediting the conveyance of message to any corner of the world within the shortest possible time. In other words, majority of the people now have the means to contact their loved one's by pressing a single button on their phone regardless of the geographical barrier that exists between them. For instance, owing to the magical touch of technology, people can not only deliver messages to their near and dear ones but also send pictures, videos or other important documents instantaneously. Therefore, it is quite evident that internet has bestowed miraculous enhancements on communication sectors.
Nevertheless, despite facilitating the transmission of message through virtual communication, face to face interaction would never cease to exist. The reason behind this is that realistic conversation has a personal touch, which internet communication would never be able to replace. A recent study published in New York magazine reported that when we directly interact with our family members, the brain release a particular chemical substance that helps to get rid of our anxiety and stress, as well as increase our longevity. If people had constantly contacted with others via internet, then they would have cut themselves off the society, which, in turn, would have made them vulnerable to depression and loneliness. Hence, it is not hard to see that no matter how much technologically advanced we become, real life conversation would always have a place in our life.
In conclusion, I think that while internet has made the communication faster and convenient more than ever before, it would never become a match for face to face communication. The joys and pleasures that people attain from talking to someone directly is irreplaceable, which would likely to cause prevalence of face to face interaction in the future.
- Every culture throughout time has recorded its history in one way or another In what ways can history be passed on to the next generation Why is history important to society 92
- The government should allocate more funding to teaching sciences rather than other subjects in order for a country to develop and progress To what extent do you agree 73
- Companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities To what extent do you agree 96
- Nowadays parents put too much pressure on their children to succeed What is the reason for doing this Is this a negative or positive development 81
- Both governments and individuals are spending vast amount of money protecting animals and their habitats This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in sociely such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 409, Rule ID: ONES[1]
Message: Did you mean 'one's'?
Suggestion: one's
...w have the means to contact their loved ones by pressing a single button on their ph...
^^^^
Line 7, column 253, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[3]
Message: The pronoun 'someone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'is'.
Suggestion: is
...attain from talking to someone directly are irreplaceable, which would likely to ca...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, nevertheless, so, then, therefore, well, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 61.0 41.998997996 145% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2099.0 1615.20841683 130% => OK
No of words: 392.0 315.596192385 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.35459183673 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44960558625 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13873698757 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 232.0 176.041082164 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.591836734694 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 675.9 506.74238477 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9441127424 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.1875 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5625 7.06120827912 150% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272796026455 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0912587553279 0.084324248473 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0586103826659 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179346416543 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0699839451666 0.056905535591 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 78.4519038076 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.