It is important to consider whether to spend a great deal of money on arts and artists. While some agree to continue funding on arts, others are of the opinion to invest this money on more pressing issues. In my opinion, government should make sure to spend equal amount of money on both sectors as each has its own cause for receiving monetary support.
To begin with, art is considered as an indispensable part of a society. This is because it plays a vital role in a country’s cultural heritage, which connects us with our traditional customs, beliefs and our unique way of living. In other words, it distinguishes every nation from one another in terms of their culture and tradition. Consequently, cessation of investment on arts would result in obsolescence of our own cultural identity. Another point to consider is that art galleries and museums provide million dollars’ worth of revenue to the nation every year. For instance, thousands of art enthusiasts from all over the world visit Italy, Spain and Greece to admire the magnificent works of prominent artist such Leonardo Da Vinci, Pablo Picasso and many more, which generates nearly half of the total income of those countries. Therefore, it is quite evident that art does not drain the government resources only; instead, it opens up opportunities to boost a country’s economy.
On the other hand, many developing countries are facing many problems, namely poverty, illiteracy and unemployment. These sectors require immediate attention from the government or else they would go out of control. A report published from the United Nation stated that 65% of the world population is still living below the poverty line and do not have access to basic needs. Moreover, due to scarcity of healthcare services, lots of people not only suffer from avoidable diseases but also become a victim of premature fatalities. Hence, these problems cannot be overlooked at all. Instead of stopping support to arts, government can utilize the money earned from art sectors to subsidize such pressing problems.
In conclusion, it is not hard to see that both art sectors and other alarming problems of the countries have their own reasons for getting an uninterrupted fund from the governments. I think that government should devise a plan to allocate equal amount of funds for both categories so that neither of them go unnoticed.
- Both government and individuals are spending too much money protecting animals and their habitat This money should be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care To what extent do you agree 89
- Many countries aim to improve their living standard by economic development but some important social values are lost as a result Do you think the advantages of economic development outweigh the disadvantages 95
- Most societies has its homeless people Some people think that the best way to help them is to give them money 78
- Many criminals commit further crimes as soon as they released from prison What do you think are the causes of this What possible solutions can you suggest 97
- Some educationalist thinks that international exchange visit would benefit teenagers in the school To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 508, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a million'.
Suggestion: a million
... that art galleries and museums provide million dollars’ worth of revenue to the nation...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 321, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s so that neither of them go unnoticed.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, if, look, moreover, so, still, therefore, thus, while, for instance, i think, in conclusion, in my opinion, in other words, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 63.0 41.998997996 150% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2002.0 1615.20841683 124% => OK
No of words: 393.0 315.596192385 125% => OK
Chars per words: 5.0941475827 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.45244063426 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78657904218 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 238.0 176.041082164 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605597964377 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 627.3 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.8766769247 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.222222222 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8333333333 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.4444444444 7.06120827912 148% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177657961698 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523411397349 0.084324248473 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461557633876 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105156803063 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0569771225346 0.056905535591 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.