Some people work for the same organisation all their working life. Others think it is better to work for different organisations.
Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
There is no denying that getting a decent job represents a person’s status and asset. In the past, many people were more inclined to stick to a profession permanently. However, different individuals now claim that switching jobs bring enormous advantages. Both viewpoints will be critiqued before reaching a reasoned conclusion.
First of all, many people used to spend their entire working life, devoting to the same organization. It is understandable that people voluntarily consent to the welfare that a stable career provides as well as they are familiar with job security. Moreover, by staying at a fixed workplace, an individual can gain thorough knowledge about the company’s history, objective, and vision. Therefore, a person is wholly capable to handle and master tasks, responsibilities professionally in their area, subsequently, they will be offered off-the-job training and a superior promotion in the hierarchy. For example, civil servants and government officials can be referred to as they are the ones who dedicate constantly in the national system.
On the contrary, new young generations become more open-minded and they are the daredevils who are willing to shift jobs frequently. They believe that they are free to job options based on their high educational achievements such as a Master’s degree together with varied working experiences. For that reason, by experiencing different working environments, an individual can attain and enlarge diversified savvy in relevant fields, including many skill sets, and broaden their social networks. For instance, many jobs demand a high sense of creativity, such as a graphic designer or a content writer, so they are the ones who will be uncertain working for the same organization throughout their life.
In conclusion, though many people have determined their decision for lifelong employment, I suppose that people will be more beneficial by changing a few jobs so that they possibly grasp more opportunities in their career path.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-22 | Irish25 | 87 | view |
| 2021-10-25 | lethithuphuong | 87 | view |
| 2021-09-16 | nhinhi999 | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-19 | huyenphuong1702 | 78 | view |
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 78
- The graph below shows the proportion of the population aged 65 and over between 1940 and 2040 in three different countries 78
- People think that government should increase the cost of fuel for cars and other vehicles to solve environmental problems Give your opinion 95
- The chart below gives information on the percentage of British people giving money to charity by age range for the years 1990 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- Some people work for the same organisation all their working life Others think it is better to work for different organisations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own 95
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, i suppose, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 301.0 315.596192385 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38205980066 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16525528304 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10156333917 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614617940199 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 504.0 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7637673261 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.06120827912 156% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.137081775675 0.244688304435 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0488680492309 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487985372213 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0842528719117 0.151304729494 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0285406053921 0.056905535591 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.13 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 78.4519038076 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.