The bar chart below shows the estimated sales of jeans for two companies next year in Turkey. The pie chart shows the projected market share of the two companies in jeans at the end of next year.
The bar chart illustrates the projection on jeans sales for in Turkey next year, while the pie chart highlights the anticipated market share for the two companies and the rest in this product in some last days next year.
In general, while the number of sales jeans for Jack and Jones Co will be smaller than that for Mango Co in two months, Jack and Jones Co is forecast to be the first rank in the market share.
It is noticeable that the figure for estimated sales of jeans in Jack and Jones Co is predicted to fall considerably from January to February by around 200 thousand of pairs. Then, after three months of staying constant at nearly 400 thousand of pairs, the number of sales jeans is expected to rise significantly to reach a peak of approximately 9000 thousand of pairs. In terms of Mango Co, after decreasing moderately by roughly 50 thousand of pairs in the January-February period, the figure for jean products, which are sole for Mango Co is forecast to grow substantially to about 600 thousand of pairs.
Turning to the pie chart, it is predicted that Jack & Jones Co alone will stand at half of the market share while Mango Co will have 30% market share. Also, the rest of jeans cooperation will occupy 20%.
- the graph below shows the number of tourists visiting a particular Caribbean island between 2010 and 2017 summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
- The chart shows the information about salt intake in the US in 2000 50
- The diagrams below give information about the manufacture of frozen fish pies 89
- The plans below show the layout of a university s sports centre now and how it will look after redevelopment Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, then, while, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 1.00243902439 399% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1018.0 965.302439024 105% => OK
No of words: 220.0 196.424390244 112% => OK
Chars per words: 4.62727272727 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.58155801019 2.65546596893 97% => OK
Unique words: 111.0 106.607317073 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.504545454545 0.547539520022 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 283.868780488 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.3585460626 43.030603864 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 145.428571429 112.824112599 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.4285714286 22.9334400587 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.28571428571 5.23603664747 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.328319769217 0.215688989381 152% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.161496857497 0.103423049105 156% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172325714317 0.0843802449381 204% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.238111309458 0.15604864568 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.196564686806 0.0819641961636 240% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.2329268293 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.93 61.2550243902 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 10.3012195122 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.17 11.4140731707 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.47 8.06136585366 93% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 11.4329268293 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 19.0 11.0658536585 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.