The pie charts and table give information about the total value and sources of fish imported to the US between 1988 and 2000.
The given charts detail the information on the import business of fish in the US from Canada, China, and others over a period of 12 years between 1988 and 2000. The table provides the total value invested( in billion dollars), and the pie chart describes the proportional rate change in the context of different sources.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that with the passing time, China surpasses Canada and other countries with an exceptional spike rate of exporting fish to the US. Although the fish import was expanding, 2000 marked the year of maximum import value.
According to the given illustration, the US was spending a total of 6.57 billion dollars on fish trading in 1988. Within a period of 4 years, the import climbed up by 2 billion dollars, and by the end of the period, a dramatic surge jumped the total import value to 10.72 billion dollars.
On the other hand, Canada, who was leading the US fish import trade in 1988 with two-third of the total import, experienced a sharp dropdown of 26% in 1992 before plummeting down below half of the initial value(28%) in 2000. On the contrary, china pushed Canada down by grappling up nearly half of the total imports in 1992(27% rose up by 19%). Despite a slight dip of just 4%, China maintained the top position in 2000. Also, other countries rose steadily over time to a value of 13%, 20%, and 30% during respective periods
.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-21 | minh2012 | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-08 | nurullaili69 | 67 | view |
| 2022-09-07 | nurullaili69 | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | dddd | 67 | view |
| 2022-07-30 | dddd | view |
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 Describe the information 73
- The bar graph on average weekly household expenditure by region 2007 09 78
- The bar chart below shows the percentage participation of men in senior development in three companies between 1980 and the year 2010 84
- The charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing and industrialized countries in 1980 and 1990 73
- The graph above compares the number of visits to two new music sites on the web 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 209, Rule ID: NODT_DOZEN[1]
Message: Use simply: 'a billion'.
Suggestion: a billion
...le provides the total value invested in billion dollars, and the pie chart describes th...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 495, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ver time to a value of 13%, 20%, and 30% during respective periods .
^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., and 30% during respective periods .
^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, look, so, third, on the contrary, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 6.8 88% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 33.7804878049 157% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1177.0 965.302439024 122% => OK
No of words: 247.0 196.424390244 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76518218623 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.73543355544 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.49016992993 2.65546596893 94% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 106.607317073 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550607287449 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.482926829268 828% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.4291756474 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.7 112.824112599 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.1 5.23603664747 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355280110387 0.215688989381 165% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.136524309626 0.103423049105 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0844580750041 0.0843802449381 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.227614687217 0.15604864568 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101643216684 0.0819641961636 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 61.2550243902 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.68 11.4140731707 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.79 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 62.0 40.7170731707 152% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.