The table below shows information and predictions regarding the change in the percentage of the population aged 65 and above in three countries.
The given table details and forecasts the proportional change in the population of aged people( 65 and above) in mainly three countries: Canada, Germany, and the UK for three different periods 1988, 2000, and 2030.
Looking from the overall perspective, it is readily apparent that over time, the percentage of senior citizens has increased significantly and is expected to surge at a higher rate in the future. Although the population is rising as a whole, Germany is going to lead by the end of the period.
According to the given illustration, with more than 20% senior population, Germany topped the list exceeding Canada and UK by 4 and 6% respectively in 1988. Also, after a period of 12 years, Germany continued to be at the highest rank with 25.32%, higher by nearly 4%. Followed next by Canada, which jumped to 20.67% from 16.32% in 1988. However, Uk witnessed a slight uptick of .6% in the aged population.
In addition, three decades from now, it is predicted that the number will get soared in all the three countries. However, Germany will be ahead of the UK and Canada by nearly 10 to 4%. The former is projected to be at 20.35% as against 26.35% for the latter.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-03-31 | vananhxh2005 | 73 | view |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | view | |
| 2021-08-26 | Ngoctranthifoe07@ | 73 | view |
| 2021-07-20 | dinhthu05 | 100 | view |
- The plans show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today 78
- Some people say that cities are a better place for children to grow up in while others believe countryside is the right choice Discuss both views give your own opinion and examples 93
- The bar graph over the students favorite subject 78
- British Emigration to selected destinations from 2004 2007 presented in a bar chart 78
- The charts below show the main reasons for the study among students of different age groups and the amount of support they received from employers 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, if, look, so, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 990.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 206.0 196.424390244 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80582524272 4.92477711251 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.78849575616 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68049092089 2.65546596893 101% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577669902913 0.547539520022 106% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9701873648 43.030603864 118% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.23603664747 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150138791583 0.215688989381 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523957536746 0.103423049105 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0816838867625 0.0843802449381 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102622370403 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0994166913372 0.0819641961636 121% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 13.2329268293 87% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 61.2550243902 111% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 10.3012195122 84% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 11.4140731707 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 51.0 40.7170731707 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 11.4329268293 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.