Compare the line graph
The line graph provides the information about regional household recycling rate in percentages in the UK, France and Germany between 2005 and 2015
Overall, recycling rate in the UK and Germany increased gradually while France depicts downward trend till 2013 and experienced a reverse in trend after 2013. At the beginning of period, France had highest recycling rate as compared to the UK and Germany.
Recycling rate of UK started to increase from nearly 35% in 2005 to almost 40% in 2007 and it remained constant till 2009. After that, rate increased steeply till 2011 to almost 55% and gradually rose to 60% and slightly close to 60% in 2013 and 2015 respectively. Similarly, Germany had 20% recycling rate in 2005 and rose up to around 25% in 2007, further enhance to more than 30% in 2009. From 2009 to 2011, recycling rate gone up to around 45%, further rose up to 50% in 2013 and move up to nearly 55% by 2015.
In contrast, France had recycling rate of 50% in 2005 which declined nearly 45% in 2007, continued to downward trend around 35% by 2009 and almost cut in half by 2011. By 2013, nearly one third of household items recycled as compared to half of items in 2005. However, after 2013 recycling rate started to improve it goes up from 30% to almost 40% in 2013 and 2015 respectively.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-02 | nobitaa | 67 | view |
| 2024-04-30 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 80 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | lethianhthu | 78 | view |
| 2023-12-08 | MinhGoal1 | 56 | view |
| 2023-11-30 | lee giang | 61 | view |
- Some People believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are good at or that they the most interest Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- Some People believe that teenagers should concentrate on all school subjects But others believe that teenagers should focus on the subject that they are good at or that they the most interest Discuss both sides and give your opinion 67
- Compare the line graph 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 195, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'had the highest'.
Suggestion: had the highest
...013. At the beginning of period, France had highest recycling rate as compared to the UK an...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, similarly, third, while, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 0.0 7.0 0% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 33.7804878049 184% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1073.0 965.302439024 111% => OK
No of words: 232.0 196.424390244 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.625 4.92477711251 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47234631154 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.435344827586 0.547539520022 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 297.0 283.868780488 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 22.4926829268 111% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.3347423349 43.030603864 143% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.222222222 112.824112599 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.7777777778 22.9334400587 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 5.23603664747 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0694958448763 0.215688989381 32% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0324536151659 0.103423049105 31% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.045995032517 0.0843802449381 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0678482103145 0.15604864568 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0696262486311 0.0819641961636 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.2329268293 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 71.48 61.2550243902 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.87 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.26 8.06136585366 90% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.9970731707 109% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.