People opinions differ from whether inhabitants in a country should welcome and accept other cultures which have been brought into their nations by tourists or visitors should follow local customs and behaviors. While I agree with the second view, I believe that being accustomed to new cultures is advantageous to the host country.
On the one hand, there are a variety reasons explaining why tourists should adopt the tradition of a country. First, custom and behavior which have been formed millenniums ago are the signatures of a country, that helps all people, even toddlers and the old, easily distinguish between two nations. For example, banh chung is not only the traditional food of Vietnam but it also is a dish which reminds foreigners about Tet holiday. Second, the tradition of a country has been maintained for a long time, it is challenging for both the government and the whole residents to adopting a new culture. In Indonesia, for instance, consider giving things by left hands to be impolite while it is ordinary in other countries.
On the other hand, welcoming and accepting other cultures has a variety of benefits. Firstly, the host country has a lot of chances to take socio-economic migrant. If the government and inhabitants are easy-going and accept cultures from all over the world, visitors are likely to be appealed to that, as the result, they may desire to pay regular visit to the famous landscape. This leads to increase of tourism industry income and GDP. The second advantage is helping the native residents widen their knowledge. If a tourist who comes from Italia travels to Vietnam, he will tell us about how pizza is made, how to say hello in Italian, etc.
In conclusion, I believe that both the host country and visitors should balance between keeping local customs and behaviors and accepting the cultural difference.
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010
- The chart below show the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 100
- The graph below shows the changes in the place where people used to surf the internet in the years 1998 2000 2002 and 2004 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and makes comparisons where relevant 44
- The line graph below shows the number of annual visits to Australia by overseas residents The table below gives information on the country of origin where the visitors came from 54
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1557.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 310.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02258064516 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19604776685 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.69946038466 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58064516129 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 48.4003815974 49.4020404114 98% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.214285714 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.1428571429 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.14285714286 7.06120827912 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330816270232 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103787442481 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.129364938813 0.0667982634062 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.249541508642 0.151304729494 165% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.14501815562 0.056905535591 255% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.78957915832 138% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.