A lot of money is spent on repairing old buildings.instead of repairing old building that money should be spent on knocking down old building and building new ones. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Most of the governments considering the ancient buildings as nations cultural heritage. Even though, Some people claim that rather than renovation of old constructions that money should be spent on demolition and novel constructions. I partially agree with this as some of the ancient constructions are considered as a revenue source and irreplaceable cultural identity of the country.
Firstly, the most countries tourism department has been preserving historic buildings with great care as it is one of the economical assets. Moreover, such buildings have lots of employees and building premises includes small scale shopping centres which are a source of income for the civilians. For example, Pink city in Jaipur is the best example of the above-mentioned reasons.
Secondly, some of the old buildings had unique features and identity in terms of artefacts, beauty and complexity. Furthermore, lots of such places are embedded with respectful anecdotes. For instance, Thaj Mahal is one of the wonders of the world had a sentimental romantic story behind the construction.
However, Some peoples who prefer to destroy old buildings states that such buildings no longer meet today's safety standards which leads to unexpected collapse of building at any time. For instance, the Mullaperiyar dam in Kerala is one of the ancient construction which expecting disaster at any time.
Secondly, demolishing the building which has no property value to increase the market value is a better option than protecting such buildings.
To conclude this, i firmly beleve that protecting the old building as nations valuable assets by the citizens of the same is necessary to show patriotism.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-02 | M.Nazeem Shifnas | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-02 | M.Nazeem Shifnas | 61 | view |
- GOVERNMENT SHOULD FUND SCIENTIFIC RATHER THAN COMMERCIAL ORGANIZATION TO WHAT EXTENT DO YOU AGREE OR DISAGREE WITH THE STATEMENT Scientific research plays a significant role in the development of the country in many ways It s commonly held belief that cou 61
- Old buildings have to be replaced by new one To what extent do you a free or disagree 61
- Some people think that because some children find some subjects such as mathematics and philosophy difficult they ought to be optional instead of compulsory To what extend do you agree Now a days Education plays significant role in all aspects of everyone 84
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers and books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement Give reasons for your answers with any relevant examples 78
- A lot of money is spent on repairing old buildings instead of repairing old building that money should be spent on knocking down old building and building new ones To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 266, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...uctions. I partially agree with this as some of the ancient constructions are considered as...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 19, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'countries'' or 'country's'?
Suggestion: countries'; country's
...ty of the country. Firstly, the most countries tourism department has been preserving ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 11, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...e above-mentioned reasons. Secondly, some of the old buildings had unique features and i...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1434.0 1615.20841683 89% => OK
No of words: 262.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47328244275 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04187697952 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.583969465649 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 434.7 506.74238477 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.3519815253 49.4020404114 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.307692308 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1538461538 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.30769230769 7.06120827912 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313728424348 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992340190476 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0758006863842 0.0667982634062 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148209367698 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0387780232042 0.056905535591 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.