Some people think that when recruiting, companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
While some recruiters prefer people with innovation and independence work style, the others believe that candidates who have cooperation and instruction-compliance skills will be the ones that needed to expedite the growth of the firm. From my perspective, both creativity and teamwork-ability are the top factors for every recruiter to consider when recruiting.
At first, it is reasonable for why open-minded and self-reliant people are so superior as they are capable of thinking outside the box and coming up with an unexpected but amazing ideal, which will help the firm compete against other rivals. While most of the products these days are commercialized for the sake of profit and look almost the same through many brands, merchandise with unique distinctions will absolutely intrigue buyers. iPhone X, for instance, has created a huge fever in the mobile phone market at the time of its launch thanks to a brand-new, unusual, and astonishing feature: face ID.
On the other hand, for the development of the company, joint work and joint effort are vital. It is not hard to realize that every success is made possible by team-working. A person with a great mind can come up with a dreamy fascinating ideal, but a team is the real ones who will make that dream come true. In many enterprises, the tasks are shared all among the employees, and only with proper coordination and fewer ego conflicts, the works are finished in an effective way within the deadline. Understanding the role of teamwork, a lot of corporations hold activities to help bonding the employees. A factory named NDL in south Vietnam, for example has a monthly event with many team-building games for all of their staff.
In conclusion, as innovation and collaboration are equally signìicant for the business to achieve success, candidates should have both of these factors. It is suggested that the nature of work will also decide which factor that the recruiters want more from their applicants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-01-27 | Fila | 73 | view |
| 2022-09-22 | jany01 | 67 | view |
| 2022-06-08 | gwyneth+12 | 78 | view |
| 2020-09-10 | stsoutsold | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-03 | moctutuyen | 84 | view |
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both views an 84
- Some people think that when recruiting companies should aim to take on people who are innovative and able to work independently while others considered they should recruit people who are able to work in a team and follow instructions Discuss both views an 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...recruiter to consider when recruiting. At first, it is reasonable for why open-...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 450, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: IPhone
...ctions will absolutely intrigue buyers. iPhone X, for instance, has created a huge fev...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ual, and astonishing feature: face ID. On the other hand, for the development o...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 470, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effective way" with adverb for "effective"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...r ego conflicts, the works are finished in an effective way within the deadline. Understanding the ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...building games for all of their staff. In conclusion, as innovation and collabo...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, look, so, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1658.0 1615.20841683 103% => OK
No of words: 325.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10153846154 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24591054749 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0635463072 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 199.0 176.041082164 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.612307692308 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.7715491078 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.538461538 106.682146367 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.0 20.7667163134 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.23076923077 7.06120827912 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.217592781457 0.244688304435 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.067305716887 0.084324248473 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0708958492264 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.141285295993 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0917620429845 0.056905535591 161% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.35 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.