Some people think that it is best to live in a horizontal city while others think of a vertical city. Discuss both views and give your opinion
Nowadays there are different point of view about the urban planning that worth to live. While several people believed that living in a vertical city is optimal, many others keen on a horizontal one. From my perspective, although both type of development has its own attraction, I was totally convinced that living in the latter city is much more desirable
On the one hand, there is a variety of explanations for why people prefer to live in a city that developed vertically. To begin with, living in a high-rise building is much convenient as well as affordable when compared to a flat house. There seem to be shreds of evidence that skyscrapers themselves commonly contain numerous essential facilities including supermarkets, gymnastic club or even kindergarten, to mention but a few, on the different floor of their building. Therefore, the resident no longer needs to travel a long distance to gain their commodities and services. Furthermore, since major of the population is living in the apartment, there will be extra space for the community. Recreational playground for physical activities can be a good case in point
Nevertheless, living in a horizontal metropolis is much more profitable due to a number of reasons. First and foremost, living in the low-rise residential building is much safer when it comes to natural catastrophes. It is irrefutable that evacuating all the people living in the high tower is time-consuming and more difficult than the ones accommodating in the ground houses since the population density is exceeding. Another reason that worth pointing out is lie in the personalized outdoor living areas. The lofty building inhabitants are allegedly to have a serious shortage of outdoor space, which is ideal for relaxation and physical exercise along with fostering the sense of communication by interacting with their neighbours. Consequently, citizens in these cities often choose a sedentary lifestyle, which may detrimental to their health
To sum up, while the vertical metropolis citizens take advantages of affordable rental price, convenient facilities and more public space, living in the horizontal ones is better since it is safer when the natural disaster took place and each household has their own outdoor space for relaxation and communicating with their neighbour
- Children spend too much time watching TV nowadays. What are problems and solutions? 78
- The charts below show the percentage of monthly household income spent on various items by two different groups in one European country 42
- Today many children spend a lot of time playing computer games and little time on sports. Why is it? Is it a positive or negative development? 78
- Developed countries have created many environmental problems in the World particularly in their contribution to global warming Why is global warming a problem What can be done to reduce the dangers of global warming 86
- Many people now undertake extreme activities from hang gliding to mountain climbing Why do people risk their lives in this way and do you think this is a good trend 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...activities can be a good case in point Nevertheless, living in a horizontal met...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, furthermore, if, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, while, as to, as well as, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1956.0 1615.20841683 121% => OK
No of words: 367.0 315.596192385 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32970027248 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.37689890912 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09813458114 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 176.041082164 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.564032697548 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 628.2 506.74238477 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.2975951904 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 99.3274424739 49.4020404114 201% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 150.461538462 106.682146367 141% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.2307692308 20.7667163134 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.2307692308 7.06120827912 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182338526528 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0679716855082 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0842079285541 0.0667982634062 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128704832026 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0892509478564 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.8 13.0946893788 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 50.2224549098 69% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 7.44779559118 175% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.41 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.1190380762 130% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.