Some people think that schools should select students according to their abilities, While other believe that it is better to have students with different abilities studying together.
Discuss both the view and state your own opinion.
Learning is a very big foundation of a student. Some individuals believe that school should choose students according to their ability. Other says it is more useful for students to have own many other abilities for academic studying. In my opinion, I disagree with the former statement.I will discuss both the views.
On the first hand, Mixed ability classes provide a better environment for children's all round development. In other classes, children with different ability study together and in turn they can learn from one another. From example, a student, who is good at academic study but weak in dancing or painting, can learn how to dance or paints from his peers. In this sense, mixed ability classes allow students to develop their abilities in different subjects instead of only academic abilities.
On the other hand, I believe streaming students brings more benefits to teachers and students. As for teachers, separating children with better academic abilities from others facilities effective teaching. This practice helps teachers to control their students more conveniently and easily. Compared with mixed ability in which teacher should consider students, differences when they are using teaching methodologies, streaming makes this situation simpler. To be more specific, students are at the same level of academic ability in a class, and in turn teachers can use the same methodologies for them all. In this way, the narrower the spared of ability in the class, the more convenient the teaching can be.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2020-07-06 | vinay_vp372 | 56 | view |
- It was predicted that people in the 21st century would have much more leisure time than in past To what extent has this prediction come to true 66
- Nowadays celebrities earn more money than politicians What are the reasons for this Is it a positive or negative development 96
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 87
- Public libraries should only provide books and should not waste their limited resources on expensive high tech media such as software videos or DVDs Do you agree or disagree 81
- In some cultures children are often told that they can achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this massage 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...udents according to their ability. Other says it is more useful for students to ...
^^
Line 1, column 166, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...r ability. Other says it is more useful for students to have own many other abil...
^^
Line 1, column 289, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: I
...n, I disagree with the former statement.I will discuss both the views. On ...
^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...atement.I will discuss both the views. On the first hand, Mixed ability classes...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ts instead of only academic abilities. On the other hand, I believe streaming s...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, as for, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1285.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 242.0 315.596192385 77% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.30991735537 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72306524934 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 176.041082164 79% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574380165289 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 397.8 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 29.6975399242 49.4020404114 60% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.7857142857 106.682146367 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.2857142857 20.7667163134 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.28571428571 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.38176352705 68% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.367761910896 0.244688304435 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13492621945 0.084324248473 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0678635937997 0.0667982634062 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.276942531357 0.151304729494 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0868170936295 0.056905535591 153% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 13.0946893788 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 50.2224549098 108% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.22 12.4159519038 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 78.4519038076 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.