Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality, high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers. Others, however, think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
There has been an ongoing controversy about making complaints from high school learners to educators. While some advocate that it has detrimental effects such as disrespect and indiscipline, I believe that objective appreciation brings a variety of beneficial impacts on qualitative education.
To begin with, the encouragement of students criticizing straightforwardly their seniors would result in subjective evaluations. Some learners might assess their teachers based on their feelings and preferences instead of the contributions or techniques. A female high schooler, for instance, can evaluate her professor’s performance as poor just because of the latter’s fashion style. Another problem is that faculty members find it more difficult to punish disruptive pupils. This is because they are afraid that these students will give them a low rating, which could harm their teaching careers.
On the other hand, two-way communication produces a range of advantages to applying that are applicable for two parties. One of these benefits is to improve the profound understanding of each other. This helps teachers to know more about the learning demands of the entire class. Hence, they can implement appropriate teaching methods to meet those needs. For example, a professor in Math may teach too fast that his pupils are not able to understand. In this case, through learners’ responses, he could adjust his speed and methods so that everyone could fully retain the knowledge. Additionally, feedback from students would prevent teachers from becoming too complacent because they know that they will be evaluated regularly. As a consequence, they will have a chance for self-awareness and insight on their current strengths and weaknesses which contribute to the improvement of the teaching and learning environment as a whole.
In its entirety, although some people think that learners should not give judgments to their tutors to avoid chaos, my perspective is that the faithful assessment could make perfect in teaching and learning methods.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-05-18 | Fenny Mahara | 73 | view |
- Societies would benefit from a ban on all forms of advertising because it serves no useful purpose and can even be damaging Do you agree or disagree 90
- The best way to solve the world s environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
- The percentage of overweight children in western society has increased by most 20 in the last ten years Discuss the possible causes and effects of this disturbing trend and offer a solution 84
- One of the most serious problems that cities now face is crime Why are crime rates increasing in cities What are the most effective measures to tackle crime in urban areas 89
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students are encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others however think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, if, may, so, while, for example, for instance, such as, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 13.1623246493 68% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 37.0 24.0651302605 154% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1751.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 313.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59424920128 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20616286096 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07493340176 2.80592935109 110% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.629392971246 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.2224392356 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.4375 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5625 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.06120827912 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152118717284 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0457185911704 0.084324248473 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0389764443438 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0871980910745 0.151304729494 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270820537113 0.056905535591 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 12.4159519038 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.72 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.