A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college.
The author states that a nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college. This idea might initially sound enchanting, however, it has its pros and cons, which we need to decide after all the below items are considered.
A standardized national curriculum would mean that all the educational institutions would be teaching the same curriculum across all the states of a country. This would be beneficial for all the educational institutions as they would be able to train their teachers in accordance with the standardized syllabus, as appropriate. This in turn also exhorts all the colleges to customize their course work with required and optional electives.
In countries, which have multiple boards of education, each follow different depths in which subjects are covered and also the inclusion of practical work is at varying levels. The outcome is that, some students who come from schools that cover subjects at a superficial level, would find the college coursework to be arduous. Hence, this pinpoints that the uniformity in school curriculum can be helpful.
In addition, a standardized curriculum would provide convenience in arranging question banks for all the standardized tests across all schools. In this competitive world, wherein all the colleges and graduate schools require the elite pedigree of students, they would find the outcome of the exams as a fair deciding factor during admissions. Now this idea might come off as a fair way to assess students, but we know that every student is different. Some prodigious students might score better than other students, who are not so good at rote memorization; which is what most exams' evaluation is based on.
Albeit that this initiative was proposed with a positive idea of having a uniform syllabus, there can be some grave consequences. In a democratic country with a secular constitution, this perhaps calls for communal melee. Some communities might not agree with the content; requiring far more presence in the syllabus. A deeper and a affirmative inclusion in the syllabus especially in social studies would highlight the communities history and culture; thus edifying people to become more tolerant and congenial to diverse cultures. This example is especially true for cities/states which are melting pot of different cultures and ethnicity like New York and California. These communities might also fastidiously look out for any mention of statements which might be ignominious for their community.
In sum, I would like to conclude by stating that a national curriculum although sounds fair and convenient, this initiative if propounded by the government would result in huge commotion and bias. This would also require many revisions to the syllabus to suit the ever-growing wants and needs of the country's citizens.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-18 | ekarumeblessing@icloud.com | 66 | view |
2024-11-09 | KLH | 66 | view |
2024-09-28 | ascetichedonist | 83 | view |
2024-08-30 | Rishab@1999 | 66 | view |
2024-08-27 | Rishab@1999 | 50 | view |
- Over the past year our late night news program has devoted increasingly more time to covering national news and less time to covering weather and local news During the same time period most of the complaints we received from viewers were concerned with th 78
- A nation should require all of its students to study the same national curriculum until they enter college 66
- An international development organization in response to a vitamin A deficiency among people in the impoverished nation of Tagus has engineered a new breed of millet high in vitamin A While seeds for this new type of millet cost more farmers will be paid 68
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the pos 70
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 578, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'exams'' or 'exam's'?
Suggestion: exams'; exam's
...t rote memorization; which is what most exams evaluation is based on. Albeit that...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 332, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... presence in the syllabus. A deeper and a affirmative inclusion in the syllabus e...
^
Line 9, column 421, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'communities'' or 'community's'?
Suggestion: communities'; community's
...y in social studies would highlight the communities history and culture; thus edifying peo...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 467, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ities history and culture; thus edifying people to become more tolerant and conge...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, however, if, look, so, thus, after all, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 19.5258426966 92% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 21.0 12.4196629213 169% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 16.0 11.3162921348 141% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 33.0505617978 97% => OK
Preposition: 57.0 58.6224719101 97% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 12.9106741573 93% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 453.0 442.535393258 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33995584989 5.05705443957 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.61343653406 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92386585123 2.79657885939 105% => OK
Unique words: 241.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532008830022 0.4932671777 108% => OK
syllable_count: 746.1 704.065955056 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 6.24550561798 192% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 3.10617977528 32% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.38483146067 114% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 20.2370786517 99% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.8991295159 60.3974514979 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 120.95 118.986275619 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.65 23.4991977007 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.45 5.21951772744 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.83258426966 207% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273438830684 0.243740707755 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0917332444201 0.0831039109588 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.170689237498 0.0758088955206 225% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170729089153 0.150359130593 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.170773202665 0.0667264976115 256% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 14.1392134831 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.92365168539 141% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.99 12.1639044944 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.38706741573 104% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 100.480337079 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 11.8971910112 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.