The given table compares the number of people who visited the Ashdown Museum during the year before and the year after its refurbishment, while the pie chart gives information about the changes in visitor satisfaction in the two years, according to the results of surveys.
Overall, more people visited the Ashdown Museum after its refurbishment. Besides, a larger proportion of visitors felt satisfied after refurbishment, while significantly fewer people were dissatisfied, compared with the year before refurbishment.
As the table shows, after refurbishment, Ashdown Museum experienced a considerable increase in the total number of visitors by 18,000 people. Regarding their satisfaction, the percentage of visitors who felt satisfied rose from 30% to 40%, becoming the largest sector. A similar trend could also be observed in the proportion of very satisfied visitors, from 15% to 35%. In addition, the figure for people who didn't respond to the survey remained constant at 5%.
By contrast, 40% of the visitors felt dissatisfied in the year before refurbishment, representing the largest sector in that year, but this figure decreased significantly to 15% after refurbishment. Similarly, fewer people felt very dissatisfied. The figure for these people halved compared with the year before refurbishment, from 10% to 5%.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013 61
- In the future nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying What extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 82
- The graph below shows the differences in wheat exports over three different areas Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below 61
- The maps below show the centre of a small town called Islip as it is now and plans for its development Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The diagram below shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 411, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
... In addition, the figure for people who didnt respond to the survey remained constant...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, if, regarding, similarly, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 6.8 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 3.97073170732 353% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1136.0 965.302439024 118% => OK
No of words: 202.0 196.424390244 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.62376237624 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76996954942 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2194207756 2.65546596893 121% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519801980198 0.547539520022 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 339.3 283.868780488 120% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.07073170732 374% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.7090260481 43.030603864 148% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.6 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2 22.9334400587 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 5.23603664747 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308989482349 0.215688989381 143% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.124076925908 0.103423049105 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0978835837331 0.0843802449381 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.216109347657 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0807993564084 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.2329268293 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.32 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.46 8.06136585366 105% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 40.7170731707 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 11.0658536585 145% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.