Some college teachers prefer to ask students to watch or listen to a recorded lecture before class. In class, they will ask students to do more practices about what they have learned the lecture. Do you think this is an effective way and why?
Each college teacher determines to pursue various types of lectures. While some professors adore asking students to watch a recorded lecture before class, some deliver students ordinary lectures in courses. It is so controvertible for them to decide a specific effective way. In my view, they should not urge students to watch videos before each class. It is insufficient for students to concentrate on study in their home, spend more time on hobbies instead of videos, and inquire questions teachers as soon as possible.
To begin with, students do not focus on studies with videos in their homes. In the home, technologies, families, and pets distract passion obtained by people who want to study. Take myself an example, there is a computer near my desk where I always study assignments from my university. Once I select a break from homework, I continue to watch videos of basketball. As a result, I am not capable of devoting my study in my home. Therefore, it is a waste of time to study with recorded videos before beginning classes.
Secondly, watching a recorded lecture for students diminishes the time to consuming on their hobbies. They establish bountiful personalities through several hobbies. If they like to play sports with friends, they sometimes will be communicative people because they have to communicate with others for strategies and wins. Moreover, they choose future goals for their hobbies. People who love making products by technologies want to be a computer engineer. Consequently, universities should not use the method of teaching with a recorded video.
Finally, teachers do not provide opportunities for students to ask concerns by a recorded video as soon as possible. Students who come up with inquires against their lecturer raise a hand and ask questions in the classroom. It is so significant for them to boost their knowledge and communication skills. On the other hand, the students have to be tolerant of inquiring into their teachers until the next lectures. It definitely decreases students’ learning pace of growth.
To sum up, colleges should not emphasize on the study with a recorded video before starting lectures against students. I surely believe that students cannot converge on the study in their residence, consume their time on hobbies, and query teachers about questions as soon as possible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-29 | archerlao | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-09 | azxa7887 | 71 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | Stephen Xu | 81 | view |
| 2020-02-16 | Stephen Xu | 81 | view |
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Students are more interested in politics than they were in the past 73
- If you want to get a promotion at work which of the following measure would you take 1 do more extra additional jobs 2 participate more actively or state more personal opinions in group discussions 70
- It s the best way for teachers to help students become more interested in a subject by explaining how this subject can help students live better outside the school 80
- Which one do you think is important to long lasting friendship 1 help you when you need 2 share same interest and hobby 3 mutual trust 70
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Parent should limit the hours that children spend on digital products besides schoolwork 71
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, finally, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, while, as a result, in my view, to begin with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 15.1003584229 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 9.8082437276 51% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 13.8261648746 43% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 11.0286738351 45% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 34.0 43.0788530466 79% => OK
Preposition: 68.0 52.1666666667 130% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 8.0752688172 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1982.0 1977.66487455 100% => OK
No of words: 380.0 407.700716846 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21578947368 4.8611393121 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.41515443553 4.48103885553 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8903363682 2.67179642975 108% => OK
Unique words: 200.0 212.727598566 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526315789474 0.524837075471 100% => OK
syllable_count: 616.5 618.680645161 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.51630824373 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 9.59856630824 125% => OK
Article: 1.0 3.08781362007 32% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 3.51792114695 85% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.86738351254 161% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.94265232975 101% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.6003584229 117% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.1344086022 74% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.5374783903 48.9658058833 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.5833333333 100.406767564 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.8333333333 20.6045352989 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.04166666667 5.45110844103 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.53405017921 110% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.5376344086 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 11.8709677419 84% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.85842293907 78% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 11.0 4.88709677419 225% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.317000119834 0.236089414692 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0878620484193 0.076458572812 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0843663763632 0.0737576698707 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184985638261 0.150856017488 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101440745509 0.0645574589148 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 11.7677419355 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 56.25 58.1214874552 97% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.10430107527 51% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.1575268817 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 10.9000537634 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.45 8.01818996416 105% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 86.8835125448 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 10.002688172 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.0537634409 80% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.247311828 78% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 71.6666666667 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 21.5 Out of 30
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.