In today's contemporary world, where people are in rat race of making money, their contribution towards charity service has taken a back seat. Unpaid community service includes neighborhood cleaning, provide coaching to destitute infants, etc. It is agreed that such voluntary services need to make mandatory part of high school curriculum. This will not only make offspring socially responsible, but it will also shape their character.
Firstly, voluntary service cultivates sense of responsibility towards making the society a better place to live in, which is desirable in current scenario. For instance, as a part of 'Clean India' campaign during my high school; not only I cleaned surroundings of my school, but I also stopped littering where ever I go, speaking of which of which helped me to understand how such small contribution affects the environment on a large scale. Unfortunately, demonstration of such outcome cannot be always learn from academic subjects. Thus, it is clear that voluntary aid must be added in higher secondary programs.
Secondly, charity services cater to over all development of an individual. In addition, it cultivates qualities to be a better citizen, which will not only be limited to personal growth, but it will also uplift the society. For example, the mayor Vikas Chaturvedi of Surat city who indulged in law breaking activity in his school time expressed in a recent interview with Surat Times that charity acts in his high school helped him to fathom how his sensible actions can affect the society and engraved deep ideas in his mind, which further motivated him in becoming better persona and refrained him from illegal acts. Indisputably, this sets an epitome for the result of free community service. Therefore, it is quite evident that voluntary acts should be made compulsory part of high school subjects.
In summary, charity aid serves objectives which cannot be gained from textbooks. Hence, the idea of making it optional cannot be supported at all. After analyzing this subject, it is predicted that positive aspects of making charity service mandatory as a part high school syllabus will forever be stronger than negative ones.
- The best way to deal with rising problem of traffic and transportation is by encouraging people to live in cities rather than in suburbs and countryside To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The world today is a safer place and government should stop spending larger amounts of money on their armed forces Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that preserving natural environment is crucial However most make no effort to do so Why do you think this is happening What are some simple actions that could help the environment 89
- Some people believe that teachers have an important role to play in the educational success while others think that it is the students attitude that matters Discuss both views and share your opinion 86
- Some people believe that wild birds or animals should be forced out of the city while others think they should be kept in the city Discuss both views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 196, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[8]
Message: The proper name in singular (India) must be used with a third-person verb: 'campaigns'.
Suggestion: campaigns
... For instance, as a part of Clean India campaign during my high school; not only I clean...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: PHRASE_REPETITION[1]
Message: This phrase is duplicated. You should probably leave only 'of which'.
Suggestion: of which
...ped littering where ever I go, speaking of which of which helped me to understand how such small ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 633, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ned him from illegal acts. Indisputably, this sets an epitome for the result of f...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, therefore, thus, for example, for instance, in addition, in summary, speaking of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1841.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 350.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.26 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32530772707 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80569246427 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585714285714 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 584.1 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 85.3972335617 49.4020404114 173% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.0625 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.875 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0625 7.06120827912 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219003376342 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729855585228 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.046774867892 0.0667982634062 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133966544101 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0249638292669 0.056905535591 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 12.4159519038 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.