Some people think that Art is an essential subject for children at school, while others think it is a waste of time. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
A percentage of individuals consider art a crucial element of the school’s curriculum. While others oppose this statement and claim that it is worthlessly time-consuming, I personally think that this subject should be taught based on the student’s preference.
On the one hand, there are many reasons why students should always be encouraged to promote arts as much as science and logic. One of the many things that drawing and composing acquire is creativity and judgmental capability. This is due to the fact that arts mostly take into account not only visual skills but also audible and intellectual capabilities - unlike mathematics, where solving problems and equations are formalized. Moreover, the practice of assembling a meaningful picture or a piece of music gives more opportunities for students to develop their skills and interests. Since most children are fond of drawing and crafting, the implementation of subjects like arts and music into their academic careers would help them to put their skills to good use.
On the other hand, forcing students to adapt to subjects like arts can be backfiring in some cases. For instance, many students that participate in sports or technology may find themselves stuck in terms of working around an artistic medium. As a result, the overwhelming demands for art projects can be considerably tiring and demotivating for a large proportion of students. In addition to that, buying tools and instruments for drawing and composing can be significantly expensive, this combines with the temporary usage and reference would be wasteful for family units with low or medium income. In this case, the school should be responsible for arranging classes and sponsoring students with proper tools and environment.
In conclusion, while arts can bring together a number of factors that can kickstart children’s interests and intellectual skills, it is important to know that not all students would be able to overcome such technical and resourceful subject.
- People are living in a throwaway society which means people use things in a short time then throw them away What are its causes and what impacts can it have 80
- We cannot help everyone in the world that needs help so we should only be concerned with our own communities and countries To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 89
- The graph below shows the number of hours per day on average that children spent watching television between 1950 and 2010 84
- The Internet means people do not have to travel to foreign countries to learn about their lives and culture To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Some say that news has no connection with most people s lives and it is a waste of time for most of us to read newspapers and watch television news programs Do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 768, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...p them to put their skills to good use. On the other hand, forcing students to a...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_BEGINNING_RULE
Message: Three successive sentences begin with the same word. Reword the sentence or use a thesaurus to find a synonym.
... with proper tools and environment. In conclusion, while arts can bring togeth...
^^
Line 7, column 243, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...such technical and resourceful subject.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, as a result, in some cases, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 41.998997996 90% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1700.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 316.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37974683544 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.04582259782 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.594936708861 0.561755894193 106% => OK
syllable_count: 514.8 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9557263461 49.4020404114 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.769230769 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.3076923077 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.84615384615 7.06120827912 139% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.184751290549 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.064831774603 0.084324248473 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0420053166308 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11567187013 0.151304729494 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0469634327398 0.056905535591 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.