In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Others believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
In this 21st centur, in many of the countries, transportation system is the major source of income. Some individuals reckon that, it is sine-qua-non for the government to expend huge number of money on building new railway lines for fast running train between metropolises. Others, however, think that author ought to be spent on improving existing transport. I will discuss on both of these arguments before coming to my opinion.
On one hand, presently, most of the people are fascinating about travel to megacities by high speed train because people are becoming modern and they believe that, it is essential to go outside for getting enjoyment and stay safe from mental issues : stress; anxiety and so on, also they prefere to reach their destination as early. Not only the citizens but also it is very benevolent for government as well as country. For an instance, if author spends some finance on constructing new railway lines for faster bullet trains, it assists to increase the income for country by the collection of ticket fund, which makes economical progress.
On the other hand, nowadays, most of the mankinds have their own vehicles : car; bike and many more, they utilise these very often for many purposes : to visit new places,, for going to job, to visit their relatives and many more. It is better for the author to disburse money to improve present transportation system because people are used to with their own automobiles vis-á-vis public transport. Many people's lives are based on driving, they earn money. For an example, in many countries : China, India, Thailand and many tourist nations, where most of the individuals fulfill their needs and earn money from driving cabs, trucks and so on.
In my opinion, it is better for government to expend money upon both fast train lanes and existing transportation system because both help incline income for people and country as well.
To conclude, high speed train attracts individuals to travel and makes financial progress and people have their own vehicles, accordingly, author need to improve today's transport : better roads, street lights and so on.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-02-20 | MinyiChu | 67 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 61 | view |
| 2024-02-03 | Wardiati Yusuf | 67 | view |
| 2023-12-30 | Tường Vân | 73 | view |
- The tables below give information about sales of fairtrade labelled coffee and bananas in 1999 and 2004 in five European countries 67
- The crime rate nowadays is decreasing compared to the past due to advance technology which can prevent to solve crime Do you agree or disagree 84
- Today children are spending much more time watching ki compared to the past Why do you think this happens In this a positive or negative 92
- The Pie Charts below show electricity generation by source in New Zealand and Germany in 1980 and 2010 67
- The table below shows Top 10 countries with largest population in 2019 and how it is projected to change by 2100
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 22, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
In this 21st centur, in many of the countries, transportation...
^^
Line 3, column 326, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ey prefere to reach their destination as early. Not only the citizens but also it...
^^
Line 3, column 622, Rule ID: ECONOMICAL_ECONOMIC[1]
Message: Did you mean 'economic' (=connected with economy)?
Suggestion: economic
... collection of ticket fund, which makes economical progress. On the other hand, nowada...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 171, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
... for many purposes : to visit new places,, for going to job, to visit their relati...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, however, if, so, well, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1786.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.11747851003 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64040743304 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550143266476 0.561755894193 98% => OK
syllable_count: 540.9 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.2975951904 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 76.721890753 49.4020404114 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.384615385 106.682146367 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8461538462 20.7667163134 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.359071889888 0.244688304435 147% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.126031367842 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0739475938546 0.0667982634062 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200762194711 0.151304729494 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0908774311688 0.056905535591 160% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.55 50.2224549098 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.55 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.1190380762 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.