Having more money and less free time is better than earning less money and having more free time. Discuss both views and state your opinion.
Conventional wisdom has it that money cannot buy happiness. It is widely believed that earning less salary and having more free time is far beneficial than being affluent and having no leisure time. In this essay, I shall refer to some sociological studies to discuss both these views followed by my opinion.
To begin with, to earn more money, arduous work is required. Those, who follow hectic schedules, have less or no time for their personal growth. Consequently, their health is compromised, which in turn, has serious repercussions. For example, a study by the Biological Science Organisation shows that around 75 percent of rich people are prone to anxiety attacks, heart diseases, and other physical and mental illnesses, however, this percentage among the middle class is only 30 percent. Moreover, what is the benefit to earn money when you cannot get enough time to spend it on your growth? Also, human relationships get affected if they are not given the required time and attention.
While, on the other hand, if an individual could only earn their livelihood without any extravagance, but have enough leisure time, that they could invest on their holistic growth, he/she would be at an advantage. This is because, additional time would be available to spend with their families, which would strengthen their relationships. Furthermore, the sense of gratification would be higher. To exemplify, the Human Psychology Institute states that the impact of personals affairs on a person's life determines psychological growth and development. Thus, it is incontrovertible that getting an adequate amount of time for personality development is necessary.
To conclude, a healthy lifestyle and contentment are imperative for living happily, however, without investing the required time on personal growth it cannot be achieved. From my perspective, although money matters for basic needs, it should not hinder other aspects of life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-29 | kaushikdomadiya713@gmail.com | 61 | view |
| 2020-07-18 | Jaskaran Kaur | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-07 | Mariamirabella | 73 | view |
| 2019-06-10 | Tolik | 62 | view |
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter explain why you want to work in the company s head office for si 67
- You have seen an advertisement in an Australian magazine for someone to live with a family for six months and look after their six year old child Write a letter to the parents In your letter explain why you would like the job give details of why you would 78
- It is often said when in Rome do as the Romans do Do you think people should adapt and accept the culture o f the country they visit Do you think it is possible to learn a culture without learning its language 95
- Write a letter to your landlord telling him how satisfied you are with your apartment and the improvement needed Tell him What are you happy with in the apartment Areas that need approvement How the change will be good for you 78
- You recently moved house and you used a removal company to help you move your belongings However some of your things were damaged in the move Write a letter to the manager of the removal company In your letter Give details of the move Describe the damage 89
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...at the impact of personals affairs on a persons life determines psychological growth an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38079470199 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.944222573 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0167233098 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313913601279 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936793660742 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105602343805 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205069625723 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154012152774 0.056905535591 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 492, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'persons'' or 'person's'?
Suggestion: persons'; person's
...at the impact of personals affairs on a persons life determines psychological growth an...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, furthermore, however, if, moreover, so, then, thus, while, for example, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1625.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 302.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38079470199 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.944222573 2.80592935109 105% => OK
Unique words: 192.0 176.041082164 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.635761589404 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.0167233098 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.5625 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.875 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0625 7.06120827912 114% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313913601279 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936793660742 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105602343805 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.205069625723 0.151304729494 136% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.154012152774 0.056905535591 271% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.39 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.