Some People believed that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes (for instance: working for a charity, improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children). To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Within the final few a long time, numerous modern thoughts and convictions emerged pointing to move forward society and fortify the relationship between individuals of a society. One of the proposed thoughts, but still being tracked, is to form it obligatory for high schools students to do a few programs, of course, charity ones, to support their community.
First of all, we are totally supporting the thought that: making a difference advance the society is one the most obligations of a equitable and positive member. Envision that within the excursion, a few adolescents, and even all ages, work for charitable associations which offer assistance the destitute, the wipe out, the learners and others. Envision other gather cleaning and brightening the roads-of course, that will not influence their nobility - or educating the youthful. Undoubtedly that will lead to an amazingly cutting edge, civilized and adoring community. In any case, all these are illustrations, and there are numerous other ways to move forward social orders, both charitable and uncharitable strategies. In spite of this, the thought of obligatory, will not lead to the courageous reason of the charitable work that is the inward crave to assist others, but, instead, will make it a sort of wrapping up our work.
We know that this proposed thought points to instruct high school understudies to be dependable to their society and to take care of others, but we think there is a more productive strategy. There are now working bunches in numerous school totally different places which do such charitable work and even without motivation from the school's organization. So why not make numerous bunches in all schools, and we think that will pull in numerous understudies.
In brief, we think there are other superior ways to advance the society without making it obligatory; the obligatory subjects are sufficient.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-07-19 | Chihuynh99 | 77 | view |
- Government should spend money railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some People believed that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for instance working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 130, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
... society is one the most obligations of a equitable and positive member. Envision...
^
Line 3, column 332, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'schools'' or 'school's'?
Suggestion: schools'; school's
...rk and even without motivation from the schools organization. So why not make numerous ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, still, in brief, of course, sort of, first of all, in any case, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1593.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 304.0 315.596192385 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24013157895 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17559525986 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90245612289 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542763157895 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 5.0 0.809619238477 618% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.9124690277 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.75 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3333333333 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.91666666667 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0956128683197 0.244688304435 39% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035283467047 0.084324248473 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0503357512681 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0591749261616 0.151304729494 39% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.042313851784 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.41 12.4159519038 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.88 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.78957915832 153% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.