Government should spend money railways rather than roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Fast and safe transportation framework and progressed communication are two imperative perspectives of the advancement of a nation. Each government works for it citizens to commute securely and rapidly where as businesses too depend on a strong transportation framework. In this way once the address emerges whether a government ought to center on progressing its railways or roads, individuals appear like have separated suppositions. We actually concur that a government ought to spend more cash on railways framework.
First of all, railways offer secure commuting both for the citizens and dealers. The number of road mischances and highway casualties in numerous nations are distant higher than that of the railway casualties. Rails cause comparatively less environmental damage whereas the street vehicles are the most reason for expanding contamination around the world.
Secondly, rails can carry hundreds of individuals and a few hundred tons of merchandise whereas street transports can carry as it were a couple of. A few shuttle trains are numerous times quicker than that of private cars and open buses. Thus moved forward railroads would spare peoples' profitable time each day.
Thirdly, rail lines are usually absent from the main cities which is why a few active cities have no other options than to make strides their rail transportation framework. Express trains can diminish the traffic blockage in numerous cities and more venture to move forward the railroad is the only conceivable solutions in cities where a huge number of individuals live in.
Finally, the population of the world is expanding rapidly which is why contributing more cash on faster and tried and true transportation framework is more logical than contributing within the more seasoned transportation of framework. Railroads will be future in transportation and venture on it is the superior choice for any government.
To conclude, we believed that government, either in a created or creating nation, ought to contribute to construct a more secure, faster and more solid transportation framework and the railroad, for this reason, ought to gain a need.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-25 | elham mousavi | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-20 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-08-06 | Anmol Bal | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-30 | elham mousavi | 73 | view |
| 2024-07-21 | elham mousavi | 61 | view |
- Government should spend money railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Some People believed that unpaid community service should be a compulsory part of high school programmes for instance working for a charity improving the neighbourhood or teaching sports to young children To what extent do you agree or disagree 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHERE_AS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'whereas'?
Suggestion: whereas
...itizens to commute securely and rapidly where as businesses too depend on a strong trans...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 223, Rule ID: TOO_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to depend'?
Suggestion: to depend
...ecurely and rapidly where as businesses too depend on a strong transportation framework. I...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 502, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'railways'' or 'railway's'?
Suggestion: railways'; railway's
... government ought to spend more cash on railways framework. First of all, railways offe...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, but, finally, first, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, thus, whereas, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1814.0 1615.20841683 112% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41492537313 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10095092451 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561194029851 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 557.1 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.5447656373 49.4020404114 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.933333333 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.4 7.06120827912 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.38176352705 137% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0825811727809 0.244688304435 34% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0345515854467 0.084324248473 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461487776067 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0420516129375 0.151304729494 28% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0401610035097 0.056905535591 71% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.