Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement

Essay topics:

Scientific developments in farming always bring major benefits.

To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

In the last decade we have seen numerous developments in our life. Not only the technology have made our life easy but it have also changed our lifestyle. Today’s topic reveals, scientific developments have brought positive impacts for farmers; is it right or wrong. I will set forth some reasons with examples and give my opinion by the end.

With introduction of technology in farming, farmers have enjoyed its various benefits. One of its benefit is easy farming. Now farmers do not have to do hard time consuming labour with buffaloes to plough the land for seeding and soughing, instead they can use tractors and combines which is time efficient and less labour for the farmer. A recent survey in India states that there has been increase in the manufacturing of farming equipment by 15% duve to its benefits.

Another thing that bolster my point of view is soil testing for minerals and nutrients and than planing the crop accordingly that helps in significant increase of crop production and nutrient retention. These type of technologies also help farmers in planing mixed cropping, in order get the most out of their farms. Farmers use different technologies like scaling and levelling at their farm, which has made their life easier.

Summing up my points in the essay, i completely agree with the statement. I believe that food is one of the basic necessities of a human being and a farmer spends their entire life in the farms to meet our needs. Therefore, if technologies are helping them making their work load easy, we should support that.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2024-08-06 Anmol Bal 73 view
2024-06-03 elham mousavi 56 view
2024-01-02 Amna Zeeshan 67 view
2024-01-02 Amna Zeeshan 56 view
2023-12-11 c0758910@mylambton.ca 56 view
Essays by user Anmol Bal :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 268, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
...acts for farmers; is it right or wrong. I will set forth some reasons with exampl...
^
Line 5, column 92, Rule ID: AND_THAN[1]
Message: Did you mean 'then'?
Suggestion: then
... testing for minerals and nutrients and than planing the crop accordingly that helps...
^^^^
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this type' or 'These types'?
Suggestion: This type; These types
...crop production and nutrient retention. These type of technologies also help farmers in pl...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 36, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: i is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
.... Summing up my points in the essay, i completely agree with the statement. I ...
^
Line 7, column 75, Rule ID: EN_GB_SIMPLE_REPLACE
Message: I is a common American expression, in British English it is more common to use: I
Suggestion: I
... i completely agree with the statement. I believe that food is one of the basic n...
^
Line 7, column 109, Rule ID: BASIC_FUNDAMENTALS[1]
Message: Use simply 'necessities'.
Suggestion: necessities
...ment. I believe that food is one of the basic necessities of a human being and a farmer spends th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 258, Rule ID: ADVISE_VBG[10]
Message: The verb 'help' is used with infinitive: 'to make' or 'make'.
Suggestion: to make; make
...efore, if technologies are helping them making their work load easy, we should support...
^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, but, if, so, therefore, another thing

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1302.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 264.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93181818182 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64617427469 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 395.1 506.74238477 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.9493780684 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8571428571 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.06120827912 57% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.01903807615 139% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 3.9879759519 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.111964343488 0.244688304435 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0408752010902 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377397735022 0.0667982634062 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0650408294663 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0301351156224 0.056905535591 53% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.0946893788 86% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 50.2224549098 123% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 11.3001002004 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.31 12.4159519038 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.72 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.