Paleo diets in which one eats how early hominids human ancestors did are becoming increasingly popular Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food especially bone broth a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours They believe

Essay topics:

Paleo diets, in which one eats how early hominids (human ancestors) did, are becoming increasingly popular. Proponents claim our bodies evolved to eat these types of food, especially bone broth, a soup made by cooking animal bones for several hours. They believe it has many health-promoting nutrients, such as cartilage, which can heal our joints, and chondroitin, which promotes nerve regeneration. Skeptics point out that ingested cartilage can’t replenish cartilage in your knees or elbows and ingested chondroitin doesn’t make our brains any healthier. Yet, there is strong anecdotal evidence that people who consume bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases than those who don’t. Therefore, ancient humans knew something about our physiology that we don’t, and that by emulating the way they ate, we can cure many chronic illnesses.

In this following article, the paleo diets have been recommend by the ancient human's or our ancestors to cure the usual bone problem's human faces in today life. This diet can be result of ancestoral medicine discovery regarding the work or structure of ancestoral human beings.

In the first point, it mentions that the Proponents claims our bodies are habitat to eat to this kind of diet. Which includes the soup of animal bones, bone broth et cetra. They claims that the nutrients present in this soup can cure the long lasting problem of bones. For example, Joints, chondroitin and also nerve regeneration. This soups is prepare by cooking the animal bones for several hours. And it can help to energise the bone problems. However they didn't consider which category of human require this diet. Because during ancient times, the fitness and roles of humans were very different. Compare to today's working measure, the ancient times food cycle were more depend upon their physical self. So, during that time, this diet can be very helpful for human's. But compare to today's working life of human there is no evidence of its significance.

Also, in the second point, the skeptics have mentioned that there is no proof of ingecting cartilage can imporve the cartilage in your knees or elbows. And it cannot increase the power of our brain in any way. This theory of medical scientists challenges the applications of Paleo diet.

However, there is a mysterious discovery comes to the surface of medical science is that during ancient times, people who consumes bone broth have fewer metabolic and inflammatory diseases compare to those who have not consumed or took the paleo diet. This fact can be very challenging for today's scientist to counter. These factss tells that there is something our ancestors knew about the human physiology which we dont. And, if somehow scientists can found out or solve the mytery behind it. Then. it can be a break through for medical science and can save alot of lives by curing the chronic illnesses.

I believe these diets are not the only thing responsible for it. Their fit bodies for hunting can also be the reason of their long survival or their back immunity. They were so naturally fit that those illness couldn't hurt them during their life course.

Votes
Average: 5 (2 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2023-08-23 Ruhani 59 view
2023-08-18 Mayuresh08 70 view
2023-08-18 Akash Konar 55 view
2023-08-13 fabjaved 62 view
2023-07-16 hello_kratnesh101 47 view
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 54, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'recommended'.
Suggestion: recommended
...wing article, the paleo diets have been recommend by the ancient humans or our ancestors ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 179, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'They' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'claim'
Suggestion: claim
...animal bones, bone broth et cetra. They claims that the nutrients present in this soup...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 343, Rule ID: AGREEMENT_SENT_START[4]
Message: You should probably use: 'are'.
Suggestion: are
...and also nerve regeneration. This soups is prepare by cooking the animal bones for...
^^
Line 3, column 346, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'prepared'.
Suggestion: prepared
... also nerve regeneration. This soups is prepare by cooking the animal bones for several...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 448, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...can help to energise the bone problems. However they didnt consider which category of h...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 461, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: didn't
...nergise the bone problems. However they didnt consider which category of human requir...
^^^^^
Line 7, column 418, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...new about the human physiology which we dont. And, if somehow scientists can found o...
^^^^
Line 7, column 502, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ut or solve the mytery behind it. Then. it can be a break through for medical scie...
^^
Line 9, column 197, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this illness' or 'those illnesses'?
Suggestion: this illness; those illnesses
...munity. They were so naturally fit that those illness couldnt hurt them during their life cou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 211, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: couldn't
...ere so naturally fit that those illness couldnt hurt them during their life course.
^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, however, if, regarding, second, so, then, for example, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 19.6327345309 87% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.9520958084 85% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 11.1786427146 116% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 13.6137724551 88% => OK
Pronoun: 43.0 28.8173652695 149% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 45.0 55.5748502994 81% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 16.3942115768 30% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1911.0 2260.96107784 85% => OK
No of words: 389.0 441.139720559 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.91259640103 5.12650576532 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.44106776838 4.56307096286 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37682321564 2.78398813304 85% => OK
Unique words: 208.0 204.123752495 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.53470437018 0.468620217663 114% => OK
syllable_count: 592.2 705.55239521 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.59920159681 94% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 12.0 4.96107784431 242% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 4.0 8.76447105788 46% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.70958083832 74% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 1.67365269461 179% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.22255489022 95% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 19.7664670659 121% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.8473053892 70% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.918446565 57.8364921388 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.625 119.503703932 67% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.2083333333 23.324526521 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.33333333333 5.70786347227 58% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 5.0 5.15768463074 97% => OK
Language errors: 10.0 5.25449101796 190% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.20758483034 110% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 6.88822355289 73% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 4.67664670659 214% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.25889997238 0.218282227539 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0784801090281 0.0743258471296 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0660201644192 0.0701772020484 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135454765191 0.128457276422 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728116983795 0.0628817314937 116% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 14.3799401198 68% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 48.3550499002 132% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.1628742515 43% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 12.197005988 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.9 12.5979740519 87% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.0 8.32208582834 96% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 98.500998004 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 12.3882235529 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.1389221557 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.9071856287 67% => The average readability is low. Need to imporve the language.
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.

Attribute Value Ideal
Final score: 3.0 out of 6
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 0 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 0 2
No. of Sentences: 23 15
No. of Words: 391 350
No. of Characters: 1862 1500
No. of Different Words: 211 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.447 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.762 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.348 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 122 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 95 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 51 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 35 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 17 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 7.512 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.478 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.267 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.463 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.061 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5