The chart below gives information about the growth of urban population in certain parts of the world including the prediction of the future. Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart compares urban population increase in 3 regions and in the whole
world in 1950, 2000 and projected growth by 2030.
Overall, the proportion of the population living in cities rose in 2000 compared with
1950 in all regions and in the world as a whole. It is forecast to rise further by 2030.
In 1950, the percentage of urban dwellers in the world stood at 30%, but by 2000
almost half of the world’s population lived in urban centres. By 2030 the figure is
expected to rise to 60%. Latin America had the highest proportion of people living
in towns and cities, rising from about 40% in 1950 to 70% in 2000, with a predicted
further increase to 80% in 2030.
The figures and trends for Africa and Asia are similar. In Africa, about 11% of the
population were urban dwellers in 1950, compared with 12% in Asia. In 2000 this
increased to almost 40% in both continents. By 2030, the figures are projected to
reach 50% in Africa and 55% in Asia.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2024-05-21 | nguyenanhquan | 11 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-30 | TLan168 | 78 | view |
- Environmental protection should be the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 63
- The graph below shows the percentage of Australian exports to 4 countries from 1900 to 2012 56
- Some people think the news has no connection to people s lives so then it is a waste of time to read the news in the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The graph below shows the percentage of people in different age groups in one city who attended music concerts between 2010 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
- The plans below show a student room for two people and a student room for one person at an Australian university Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, well
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 33.7804878049 133% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 802.0 965.302439024 83% => OK
No of words: 176.0 196.424390244 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.55681818182 4.92477711251 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.64232057368 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.37037392001 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 88.0 106.607317073 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.547539520022 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 222.3 283.868780488 78% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.36585365854 238% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 22.4926829268 76% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 45.4973625609 43.030603864 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 80.2 112.824112599 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.6 22.9334400587 77% => OK
Discourse Markers: 0.9 5.23603664747 17% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 13.0 3.83414634146 339% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.11631425482 0.215688989381 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0478126006852 0.103423049105 46% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0562080846528 0.0843802449381 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478117195657 0.15604864568 31% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0411588751593 0.0819641961636 50% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.8 13.2329268293 67% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 79.6 61.2550243902 130% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 6.4 10.3012195122 62% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 8.87 11.4140731707 78% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.08 8.06136585366 88% => OK
difficult_words: 29.0 40.7170731707 71% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.9970731707 80% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.