Some people claim that the government should provide free healthcare. Other think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and its better to invest those fund in education and culture.
What is your opinion?
Improving healthcare is one of the most important concerns these days and with time it is being more expensive. Some people believe that government should provide free healthcare for their citizen while others think that instead of funding for free medical, the government should allocate that amount on education and culture. I partially agree with above statement that government should take responsibility for people’s healthcare.
To begin with, there are several reasons why government should provide the free medical facility to their citizens. Firstly, medical facility is a basic necessity provided by many developed nations and it should be provided by every country because people are paying taxes every year. For example, in this current situation of pandemic by corona virus, many people have lost their source of income. If they are infected by this virus, then how will they get a proper treatment without money. Who shall be responsible for any mishappening? Secondly, healthcare expenses are inflating day by day while income levels of individuals are not increasing proportionately. In case of any medical emergency, people who are going through financial crisis will suffer the most.
However, medical healthcare is an important aspect, but the government should not neglect the education system and culture activities as well. The government should come up with a proper plan to fund proportionately in each sector. Education is also imperative so that people should aware about their health, dietary patterns and avoid sedentary lifestyles which can make them obese. Moreover, cultural activities also have their own benefits because people should know about the history, as world is going forward with the modern technology. It is important to know where we come from and what our ancestors did to survive.
In conclusion, although medical facility is an important aspect to be taken care of by the government, but education and culture have their own benefits which the government should not neglect.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-08-02 | abashwini174@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-02 | abashwini174@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | abashwini174@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | abashwini174@gmail.com | 78 | view |
| 2020-07-29 | abashwini174@gmail.com | 65 | view |
- The government s investment in art music and theater is a waste of money Government should invest these funds in public service instead To what extent do you agree with this statement 73
- In many countries international tourism has become an important source of income However it also has negative effects Do the benefits of international tourism outweigh the disadvantages Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from y 79
- Some people claim that the government should provide free healthcare Other think that the government will not provide the most innovative methods of treatment and its better to invest those fund in education and culture What is your opinion 78
- The diagrams below show the changes that have taken place at West park Secondary School since its construction in 1950 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that physical strength is important for success in sport while other people think that mental strength is more important Discuss both views and give your own opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41640378549 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.774702151 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567823343849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1201777655 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320571945626 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998342377978 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08787082341 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197347356984 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078944226119 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, then, well, while, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.41640378549 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.774702151 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567823343849 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.1201777655 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.3125 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8125 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.25 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.320571945626 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0998342377978 0.084324248473 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.08787082341 0.0667982634062 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.197347356984 0.151304729494 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.078944226119 0.056905535591 139% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 12.4159519038 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.